Free Order Setting Mediation Conferences - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :04-cv—OO955-GIVIS Document 137 Filed O3/07/2008 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Dennis J. Buckley, As Trustee of :
the DVI Liquidating Trust, :
Plaintiff,
v. Civ. No. 04-955-GMS
Michael O’Hanlon, Steven R. Gartinkel,
Richard E. Miller, John P. Boyle, :
Anthony J. Turek, Raymond D. Fear, :
William S. Goldberg, Gerald L. Cohn, :
John E. McHugh, Harry T. J. Roberts, and :
Nathan Shapiro, :
Defendants. :
ORDER
At Wilmington this 7th day of March, 2008, IT IS ORDERED that:
l. A teleconference with all of the parties has been scheduled for March 12, 2008 at
2:30 p.m. with Magistrate Judge Stark in preparation for mediation conference(s) in this matter.
Plaintiff’s counsel shall initiate the teleconference call to 302-573-4573.
During the teleconference, counsel for Defendants O’Hanlon, Miller, Boyle, Fear, and
Cohn must be prepared to address: (i) whether any ofthe foregoing defendants have a serious health
or family issue that should excuse them from appearing at the mediation; (ii) whether there is any
other basis on which the Coun should excuse the appearance of any ofthe foregoing defendants; and
(iii) whether counsel and their clients are available for mediation on May 22, 2008, June 2, 2008
and/or June 6, 2008.
2. No mediation statements will be due on March 12, 2008.
3. No mediation conferences will be held on March 26, 2008 and March 27, 2008.

Case 1 :04-cv—OO955-GIVIS Document 137 Filed O3/07/2008 Page 2 of 2
4. A mediation conference is scheduled for May 22, 2008 beginning at 9:00 a.m.
for Plaintiff and Defendants Garfinkel, Turek and Roberts. Each party must be represented at
the mediation conference by counsel who is/are familiar with the case and who must have full
authority to act on behalf of the parties, including the authority to negotiate a resolution ofthe matter
and to respond to developments during the mediation process. While in—person attendance by the
individual clients is not required, the individual clients must be immediately reachable by telephone.
Further, attendance by local counsel is not required in this case.
Delaware counsel are reminded of their obligations to inform out-of—state counsel of this
Order. To avoid the imposition of sanctions, counsel shall advise the Court immediately of any
problems regarding compliance with this Order.
few E) , Lk;