Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

I
I
é {
Case 1:04-cv-00960-SLR Document 100 Filed 03/28/2006 Page 1 of 1
I
PHILADELPHIA NEW YORK
ATLANTA NEWARK
CHARLOTTE SAN DIEGO
f L
$3E?§L£“ COZEN s""”""§§f$fé
DALLAS WASHINGTON, DC
0 CONNGR @2.::;:;:
Los Awcetzs AIIO RNEYS
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
suns 14oo cn/rss MANHATTAN came 1201 Noam MARKET smear WILMINGTON, DE 1s>so1 -1 147 is
302.295.2000 888.207.24AO 302.295.20'I3 FAX www.cozen.com
I
March 28, 2006 David A. Felice
Direct Phone 302.295.20ll a
I Direct Fax 866.776.89ll Z.
2 [email protected]
I f
I HQEQ
Chief Judge Sue L. Robinson
3 United States District Court, District of Delaware ,
844 North King Street A
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re: J-Squared Technologies, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc., C.A. N0. 04-960-SLR
Dear Judge Robinson: _
At the request of Defendant Motorola, Inc., Plaintiffs write to correct an inadvertent I
` factual error contained in their Reply Memorandrun in Further Support of Their Motion to
, Compel. (D.I. 98). ln that reply, Plaintiffs stated that: "Beginning Friday aftemoon (3:04 MST y
— not "after business hours" in Phoenix) until the following Wednesday, Motorola was able to Q
review and comment on the proposed Motion." (D.I. 98 at 1] 4). It has been brought to our _;
I attention that the email Ms. Cates received containing the draft motion (attached as Exhibit 1 to »
Motorola’s Answering Memorandum) already accounted for the time difference between
Delaware and Phoenix, Arizona. Accordingly, the email was in fact received by Ms. Cates at I
5:04 MST, which we are informed through Motorola’s Answering Memorandum is after
business hours in Phoenix. We apologize for any confusion this error may have caused. Q
; E
As always, should Your Honor have any questions or concerns about this matter, counsel ¥
is available at Your Honor’s convenience. L
g Respectfully,
2 . g:
"`“‘1;O..1c/ VM
David A. Felice (#4090)
? *
DA1¤/ ;
I I
cc: William W. Bowser (via ECF)
11
I
I