Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California


File Size: 12.7 kB
Pages: 3
Date: April 29, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 566 Words, 3,470 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/200188/8.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of California ( 12.7 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of California
Case 4:08-cr-00065-CW

Document 8

Filed 04/29/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

BARRY J. PORTMAN Federal Public Defender SHAWN HALBERT Assistant Federal Public Defender 555 12th Street, Suite 650 Oakland, CA 94607 Tel: (510) 637-3500 Counsel for Defendant GUTIERREZ-MONTELONGO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 PRIMITIVO GUTIERREZMONTELONGO, Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. CR 08-0065 CW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE AND FOR EXCLUSION OF TIME

Defendant Primtivo Gutierriez-Montelongo is scheduled to appear in court on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 2:00 p.m. for his first appearance before this Court. Defense counsel has requested additional time to investigate the case and to obtain additional documents from outside sources. Additionally, as undersigned counsel will be taking an extended leave from the office, Mr. Gutierrez-Montelongo will need to review his case, with the additional materials that the defense hopes to obtain, with new counsel. Under the circumstances, government counsel does not object. Based on defense counsel's estimate regarding the length of time necessary to obtain records, the parties request that the matter be continued to May 28, 2008 or the next available date convenient to the Court. The parties further stipulate and agree that the time between April 20, 2008 and May 28,

-1-

Case 4:08-cr-00065-CW

Document 8

Filed 04/29/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

2008 or the next date selected by the Court, should be excluded from calculations under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A) and (B)(iv) because the continuance is necessary to provide counsel for the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and for continuity of counsel. SO STIPULATED. Dated: April 28, 2008 /S/ SHAWN HALBERT Assistant Federal Public Defender SO STIPULATED. Dated: April 28, 2008 /S/ WADE RHYNE Assistant United States Attorney I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/S/) within this e-filed document.

-2-

Case 4:08-cr-00065-CW

Document 8

Filed 04/29/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Dated: April ___, 2008 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

ORDER Good cause appearing therefore, and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is the ORDER of this Court that the above-captioned matter be continued from April 30, 2008 to May 28 23, 2008, at 2:00 p.m. for the first appearance in district court. Based on the reasons provided in the stipulation of the parties above, the Court hereby FINDS that the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and that the failure to continue the matter would deny defendant reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and the need for continuity of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv). Based on these findings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the time from April 30, 2008 to May 28, 2008, shall be excluded for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A) and (B)(iv).

CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge

-3-