YoUNo CoNAwAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
Sts? 2133;;**Gm ¥“Ei22’;3.¥·érE€£PE“ TIII5 BRANDYWTNE BUILDING °“L° S
§§1éE}1;i>-élgl ?;E!TrIéI}I§.1gEiI;`E{>;:}€)rAqLSH ]()()O WEST STREET, 17TH FLOQR EEAN M. BEACH MAT1`HE\VB.LUNN
R1CHARD;·\:.$AiPPA §
}I§1[;ZFI;R€ 1:ié\gC;I§; gI:Eq::ErLCI; $3121;;% P.O. Box 391 DTEITENCA Axiigiagr ixiiuiiiébdfiagrorr ‘
ttm HOLS agtcmm · WIIIIII~¤I¤~~ DEIAIIAM I9899-039I t;i:Té.iFt�tst42“iL“
CRAIG A. KARSNITZ TLNIOTHYJAY HOUSEAL (302) 5716600 IAN S. FREDERICKS D. FoN MU`l'1`AMARA·\VALKER
BARRY M. WILLOUGHBY BRENDAN LINEEIAN SHANNON JAMES J. GALLAGIIER JENNIFER R. NOEL
Josv w. INGERSOLL MARTIN S. LESSNER (800) 253-2234 (DE ONLY) DANIELLE GIEES JOHN J. I>AscIIEITo
.·\NT1-IONY G. FLYNN PAULINE K. MORGAN FAX (302) 57],1253 ALISON GM. GOODMAN A.D.·\.\1W.POFF
JERo>IE K.GRoSSNIAN C. BARR FI.tNN ` ` SEAN T. GREECHER SETEI J. REIDENBERG
EUGENE E; D1PRIN§1O ?Ij;TAg.IIég’§§';AN -1*; KARA S. HA>»L·»IOND FRANCIS J. Sc1IANNE
R®;;Tr.%"£Tr."· iw. Sm III WESTI’IIIE.SIEIEI r%‘.Ii$‘;t1?‘§$t§.?’““ §11$2i;ii?§?“m‘O‘:D
\V11,L1.»\MD. JOHNSTON JAMES P. HUGHES, JR. P0, BOX 994 RICHARD S. JULIE JoI·IN E. TRAEEY
Tmomv J. SNYDER EDwtNJ.1-IAJ’4.RON (;EORGgyO\vN,DELAwARE 19947 KAREN E. KELLER MAR<:ARETB.\VI»IITr;xIAN
BRUCE L. SILVERSTEIN MICHAELKNESTOR 7 . . JENNIFER M,K1NKUS CHRISTIAN DOUGLAS YIVRIGHT
WILLIAM W. BOWSER MAUREEN D. LUKE (30-) 8°6‘3’7l EDWARD J. 1
i1§m21E£5:i5“*°~’“· §§§H`§§§.’é§Y IM IIOIIIII-9338 Sm. OF
FI “° â€E“Ts “‘ B*“°“’“" II~II~II~II¤IIII¤¤¤~--I»~Y-¤¤~I §§i‘;Z?¢¥§&iti§§L駀%.tY, §‘Q€4?i¤T¤BsX?E.§§ar.
PATRICIA A. WIDDOSS
DIRECT DIAL: (302) 571-6554
DIRECT FAX: (302) 576-3467
[email protected]
BY CM/ECF AND HAND DELIVERY
The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet
United State District Court for the District of Delaware
844 King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re: Allergcm. [nc. v. Alcon Laboratories. et al., C. A. No. 04-968-GMS
Dear Judge Sleet:
I write to set forth the disputes on the agenda for the discovery teleconference set
for Tuesday, September 6, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. The disputes are:
• The parties cannot agree whether the Court should review m
camera a document authored by an inventor and sent to his non-
lawyer supervisor (listed on Al1ergan’s privilege log as PRIV626)
alongside an exemplar of the Record of Invention form used by
Allergan, to determine whether the document PRIX/626 is a Record
of Invention.
• The production of documents relating to A11ergan’s submissions to
the FDA concerning A1phagan®P.
DBOI;1s4032S.1 0635341001
Case 1:04-cv—OO968—G|\/IS Document 131 Filed O9/O2/2005 Page 2 of 2
Yourio CoNAwAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet
September 2, 2005
Page 2
· The production of inventor Orest Olejnik’s hard copy documents.
We have sent this letter to counsel for Allergan, but at the time of its submission have not
received a response. It is Alcon’s understanding that as ofthe time of this letter Allergan
has made no indication that it has any issues it plans on raising at Tuesday’s
teleconference.
Respectfully submitted,
Karen E. Keller (#4489)
JWI: kek
cc: Clerk of the Court
Daniel J. Thomasch, Esquire (by facsimile)
Jonathan Singer, Esquire (by facsimile)
William Marsden, Esquire (by hand delivery)
1>B01;1s40s2s.1 0635341001