Free Order - District Court of California - California

Case 5:08-cv-00133-RMW

Document 114

Filed 04/30/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 SENORX, INC., 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In the court's April 25, 2008 order denying plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, the parties were ordered to contact the court's Courtroom Deputy to set a trial date 60-90 days from the date of the order. SenoRx's counsel has contacted the court, stating that the parties have questions about how the court would like to proceed with the trial with respect to scheduling claim construction, disclosures under the Northern District of California Patent Local Rules, etc. The parties seek a conference with the court, but have not identified any particular areas of disagreement. The court ordered the parties to proceed on an expedited schedule based on their representations at the hearing that both were ready to proceed to trial in 60-90 days. Accordingly, the court expects the parties to meet and confer to discuss how each side anticipates proceeding on an expedited basis under the Patent Local Rules and to agree where they can about the procedures
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE--No. C-08-00133 RMW MAG

E-FILED on

4/30/08

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

HOLOGIC, INC.; CYTYC CORPORATION; and HOLOGIC LP,

No. C-08-00133 RMW ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case 5:08-cv-00133-RMW

Document 114

Filed 04/30/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

going forward. See N.D. Cal. Patent L.R. 2-1(a). The court will set a case management conference in this matter for Friday, May 9, 2008 at 10:30 a.m. to discuss particular areas of disagreement that the parties identify. The parties shall file a joint case management conference statement on or before Friday May, 2, 2008 setting forth their proposed schedule and any specific case management issues requiring the court's guidance. The parties may ask to appear telephonically by filing an appropriate request with the court's Courtroom Deputy.

DATED:

4/30/08 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge

ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE--No. C-08-00133 RMW MAG 2

Case 5:08-cv-00133-RMW

Document 114

Filed 04/30/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to: Counsel for Plaintiffs: Katharine Lyn Altemus Robert F. Ruyak Henry C. Su Matthew M. Wolf Counsel for Defendant: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE--No. C-08-00133 RMW MAG 3

F.T. Alexandra Mahaney Natalie Morgan

[email protected] [email protected]

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated:

4/30/08

/s/ MAG Chambers of Judge Whyte