Free Stipulation and Order - District Court of California - California

Case 5:08-cv-00246-JW

Document 18

Filed 04/25/2008

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

JAMES N. KRAMER (STATE BAR NO. 154709) [email protected] ERIN L. BANSAL (STATE BAR NO. 213335) [email protected] REBECCA F. LUBENS (STATE BAR NO. 240683) [email protected] ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 Telephone: +1-415-773-5700 Facsimile: +1-415-773-5759 Attorneys for Defendant Lisa C. Berry UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 13 Case No. C 08-0246-JW 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
OHS West:260424496.4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C-08-0246-JW

THE NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LISA C. BERRY, Defendant.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT LISA C. BERRY'S RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

Case 5:08-cv-00246-JW

Document 18

Filed 04/25/2008

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS, on January 14, 2008, the New York City Pension Funds ("Plaintiffs") filed a putative class action titled The New York City Employees' Retirement System et al. v. Berry, C-08-0246-MHP (N.D. Cal.) (the "Berry Action"); WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-12, a Related Case Order was entered and on February 25, 2008, the Berry Action was reassigned to Judge Ware, who is presiding over In re Juniper Networks, Inc. Securities Litigation, C-06-04327-JW (N.D. Cal.) (the "Consolidated Action"); WHEREAS, on March 5, 2008, the Court approved the parties' joint stipulation to extend defendant Lisa C. Berry's ("Berry") time to respond to the complaint in the Berry Action (the "Berry Complaint") until after the Court ruled on certain defendants' motion to dismiss in the Consolidated Action; WHEREAS, the parties are considering mediation of the claims and have conferred and agree that an extended briefing schedule on any motion filed by Berry would be appropriate; NOW THEREFORE Plaintiffs and Berry jointly submit this proposed order to the Court to establish the schedule for Berry's response to the Berry Complaint: 1. 2. Berry shall file a response to the Berry Complaint on or before June 16, 2008; Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to Berry's motion to dismiss (if filed by Berry)

no later than 30 days after Berry's motion to dismiss is filed; and 3. Berry shall file her reply brief in support of any motion to dismiss no later than 15

days after Plaintiffs file their opposition brief.

OHS West:260424496.4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C-08-0246-JW

Case 5:08-cv-00246-JW

Document 18

Filed 04/25/2008

Page 3 of 4

1 Dated: April 24, 2008 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
OHS West:260424496.4

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE JAMES N. KRAMER ERIN L. BANSAL REBECCA F. LUBENS Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

/s/ REBECCA F. LUBENS REBECCA F. LUBENS Attorneys for Defendant Lisa C. Berry

Dated: April 24, 2008

SCHUBERT & REED LLP Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1050 San Francisco, California 94111

/s/ WILLEM F. JONCKHEER WILLEM F. JONCKHEER Local Counsel for Plaintiffs The New York City Pension Funds LOWEY DANNENBERG COHEN & HART, P.C. BARBARA J. HART (Pro Hac Vice Application Pending) DAVID C. HARRISON ( Pro Hac Vice Application Pending ) One North Broadway, Suite 509 White Plains, NY 10601-2310 Telephone: 914-997-0500 Telecopier: 914-997-0035 Attorneys for Plaintiffs The New York City Pension Funds

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C-08-0246-JW

Case 5:08-cv-00246-JW

Document 18

Filed 04/25/2008

Page 4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
OHS West:260424496.4

[PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties should consult the Court's calendar for availability to hear anticipated Motions. April 25, 2008 Dated: ___________________

HON. JAMES WARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

-3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C-08-0246-JW