Free Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 189.8 kB
Pages: 4
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,015 Words, 6,573 Characters
Page Size: 614 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8455/24-1.pdf

Download Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Delaware ( 189.8 kB)


Preview Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-01103-GMS—|\/IPT Document 24 Filed 06/06/2007 Pagei of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
In re:
Chapter ll
NationsRent, Inc., et al., I Case Nos. 01-11628 through 01-11639 (PIW)
Jointly Administered
Debtors.
NationsRent Unsecured Creditor’s Liquidating
Trust, Perry Mandaiino, not personally, but as
Trustee
Plaintiff,
v.
World Wide Welding, Civil Action Number: 04-1103 (***)
Defendant.
MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(2)
OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Perry l\/Iandarino, Trustee (the "Trustee") of the NationsRent Unsecured Creditors’
Liquidating Trust (the "Creditor T1'LlSi”), by and through its counsel, hereby moves (the
"Motion") to dismiss the above-referenced case pursuant to Rule 4l(a)(2) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure (the "Federal Rules") and in support hereof respectfully states
as follows:
Background
l. On December 17, 2001, NationsRent, Inc. and eleven of its subsidiaries
(collectively, the "Debtors") tiled voluntary petitions for relief under chapter ll of the
Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101-1330 (the "Bankruptcy Code") in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the "Bank1uptcy Cou1t").
I NationsRent USA, Inc., NationsRent Transportation Services, Inc., NR Delaware, Inc., NRGP, Inc.,
NationsRent West, Inc., Logan Equipment Corp., NR Dealer, Inc., NR Franchise Company, Inc.,
Nationskent of Texas, LP, and NationsRent of Indiana, LP
6620lO-l

Case 1:04-cv-01103-GMS-MPT Document 24 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 2 of 4
2. By order dated May 14, 2003 [Docket No. 2151] (the “CO1'lfl1`1'1'1&llOI1
Order"), the Court confirmed the First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of
NationsRent, Inc. and Its Debtor Subsidiaries [Docket No. 1824] (the "Plan").1
On June 13, 2003, the Plan became effective in accordance with its terms, and the
Debtors emerged from chapter ll as reorganized entities.
3. Pursuant to Section IV.K of the Plan, the Creditor Trust was formed to,
inter alia, pursue all Unresolved Avoidance Actions (against parties not released under
the Plan) and the Retained Actions and all Unresolved Avoidance Action recoveries
(against parties not released under the Plan) and recoveries on account of the Retained
Actions.
4. On December 12, 2003, the Trustee comrnenced the above—referenced
case by filing the Adversary Complaint to Avoid and Recover Preferential Transfers
Pursuant to ll U.S.C. Sections 547 and 550 (the "Con1plaint") against World Wide
Welding (the "Defendant") in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware (the "Bankruptcy Court").
5. On March 10, 2004, the Defendant filed an answer (the "Answer") to the
Complaint. In the Answer, the Defendant did not assert any counterclaims against the
Trustee.
6. On August 24, 2004, the United States District Court for the District of
Delaware (the "District Court") withdrew the reference of the adversary proceeding, and
the Case was transferred to District Court.
7. Thereafter, the Trustee determined to dismiss the proceeding. The Trustee
made attempts in March, July and August of 2006 and March of 2007 to contact the
‘ Capitalized terms ner defined herein shall have die meanings given re such terms inthe Plan.
“62°‘°“' 2

Case 1:04-cv-01103-GMS-MPT Document 24 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 3 of 4
Defendant through correspondence to Defendant’s counsel in order to obtain a stipulation
of dismissal. However, the attempts were never answered by the Defendant.
8. On February 22, 2007, an order was entered scheduling a teleconference
in this case for March 19, 2007 and requiring Defendant’s participation. The order was
served on Defendant’s counsel. However, the Defendant did not participate in the
teleconference.
9. On March 20, 2007, an order was entered scheduling a teleconference in
this case for April 18, 2007 and requiring Defendant’s participation. The order also
stated for the benefit of the Defendant that, "failure to participate in this teleconference
may result in the denial of your claims or requests for relief in the above actions and a
dismissal of the above actions without further notice or hearing." The order was served
on Defendant’s counsel. However, the Defendant did not participate in the
teleconference.
Relief Reguested
10. The Trustee requests the entry of an order dismissing the above—referenced
case pursuant to Federal Rule 41(a)(2).
Basis for Relief Reguested
ll. Federal Rule 41(a)(2) provides:
[ejxcept as provided in paragraph (1) of this subdivision of this
rule, an action shall not be dismissed at the plaintiff’ s
insistence save upon order of the court and upon such terms
and conditions as the court deems proper. lf a counterclaim
has been pleaded by a defendant prior to the service upon the
defendant of p1aintiff’ s motion to dismiss, the action shall not
be dismissed against the defendant’s objection unless the
counterclaim can remain pending for independent adjudication
by the court. Unless otherwise specified in the order, a
dismissal under this paragraph is without prejudice.
662010-1 3

Case 1:04-cv-01103-GMS-MPT Document 24 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 4 of 4
FED. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(3).
12. The Trustee determined to dismiss the case and sent correspondence to
Defendant’s counsel requesting the execution of a stipulation of dismissal. The
Defendant ignored the Trustee’s requests to stipulate to a dismissal and ignored orders of
this Court requiring the Defendant’s participation in status conferences to discuss the
Tmstee’s proposed dismissal. The Defendant filed no counterclaim against the Trustee.
The absence of a counterclaim and the Defendant’s failure to participate in the status
conferences ordered by the Court warrant a dismissal of this case.
WHEREFORE, the Trustee requests that the Court grant the relief requested
herein and such further relief as is just and proper.
Dated: June 6, 2007
Wilmington, Delaware THE BAYARD FIRM
Neil B. Glassi§5, Esq. (No. 2087)
Ashley B. Stitzer, Esq. (No. 3891)
Mary E. Augustine, Esq. (No. 4477)
222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
Telephone: (302) 655-5000
Facsimile: (302) 658-6395
.. and -
LOWENSTEIN SANDLER PC
Paul Kizel, Esq.
Susan C. Greco—Ericksen, Esq.
65 Livingston Avenue
Roseland, New Jersey 07068
Telephone: (973) 597-2500
Facsimile: (973) 597-2400
Attorneys for NationsRent Unsecured
Creditors Liquidating Trust
662010-1 4