Free Proposed Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 120

Filed 01/31/2006

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE SRI INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. INTERNET SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., Case No. 04-1199-SLR a Delaware corporation, INTERNET SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., a Georgia corporation, and SYMANTEC CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendants.

[PROPOSED] ADDENDUM TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING PRINTING ESCROWED SOURCE CODE FILES Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the Stipulated Protective Order, Plaintiff SRI International, Inc. ("SRI") and defendants Internet Security Systems, Inc. ("ISS-DE"), a Delaware corporation, Internet Security Systems, Inc. ("ISS-GA"), a Georgia corporation, and Symantec Corporation, Inc. ("Symantec") (collectively, "Defendants") stipulate and agree that, subject to the rules below, Plaintiff shall provide Defendants with printed copies of requested files contained on Plaintiff's source code computer and Defendants shall provide Plaintiff with printed copies of requested files contained on Defendants' source code computers. The parties stipulate and agree that: 1. Upon request, the producing party shall produce to requesting party

printed copies of requested files contained on the producing party's source code escrow computer. The printed copies of requested files shall be produced within three business days (excluding weekends), unless the producing party and requesting party agree to an alternative time frame for production. A printed copy of a file shall clearly identify the

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 120

Filed 01/31/2006

Page 2 of 4

file path of the underlying file as well as any additional information required to uniquely identify the underlying file. 2. A request for printed copies of files shall include, on a file-by-file basis,

the complete file path associated with each file. If additional information is required to uniquely identify the requested files, then the request shall include, on a file-by-file basis, such additional information. Additional file information may include: the file' s version (or revision) number, the date of the version (or revision) of the file, the name of the project containing the file, the view used to locate the file, and the object ID for the file. A party may request multiple versions or revisions of the same file, but the requesting party must specify the exact dates or the exact numbers for each version or revision sought. The requesting party shall not formulate requests in terms of file directories. 3. The producing party shall have the right to object to a request within two

business days (excluding weekends) of the request being received on the grounds that either (1) the request does not conform to the rules set forth in this agreement; or (2) the request is so overly broad as to be inconsistent with the source code escrow arrangements described in the Stipulated Protective Order. 4. If the producing party makes such an objection to a request for printed

copies by the requesting party, the requested files shall not be printed until the parties have resolved such objection or the Court has ordered the printed copies to be produced. 5. The requesting party shall not make any electronic copy of the printed

files. The requesting party shall not electronically scan any of the printed files. The requesting party shall not use optical character recognition (OCR) software to process any of the printed files. 6. The producing party shall provide to requesting party up to eight

photocopies of the requested files. A request shall specify the number of photocopies desired by the requesting party (up to eight photocopies). The requesting party shall not make photocopies of the requested files. For the purposes of depositions or motion 2

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 120

Filed 01/31/2006

Page 3 of 4

practice, the requesting party may subsequently request a reasonable number additional copies of the requested files. 7. Unless the producing party and requesting party otherwise agree, copies of

requested files shall only be possessed or viewed by those individuals otherwise authorized to view the electronic version of the requested files maintained in escrow. The requesting party shall maintain a log identifying the individual ultimately in possession of each copy of the requested files. A copy of the log shall be provided to the producing party upon request. Dated: January 31, 2006 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. By: /s/ John F. Horvath Timothy Devlin (#4241) John F. Horvath (#4557) 919 N. Market St., Ste. 1100 P.O. Box 1114 Wilmington, DE 19889-1114 Telephone: (302) 652-5070 Facsimile: (302) 652-0607 Howard G. Pollack (CA Bar No. 162897) Gina M. Steele (CA Bar No. 233379) Katherine D. Prescott (CA Bar No. 215496) Michael J. Curley (CA Bar No. 230343) 500 Arguello St., Ste. 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: (650) 839-5070 Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 Attorneys for Plaintiff SRI INTERNATIONAL, INC. Dated: January 31, 2006 POTTER, ANDERSON & CORROON LLP By: /s/ Richard L. Horwitz Richard L. Horwitz (#2246) David E. Moore (#3983) Hercules Plaza 1313 North Market Street, 6th Floor P.O. Box 951 Wilmington, DE 19899 Telephone: (302) 984-6000 Facsimile: (302) 658-1192 Holmes J. Hawkins, III / Natasha Horne Moffitt KING & SPALDING LLP 191 Peachtree Street N.E. Atlanta, GA 30303-1763 Telephone: (404) 572-4600 Facsimile: (404) 572-5145 Theresa Moehlman / Jeffrey Blake 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003 Telephone: (212) 556-2100 Facsimile: (212) 556-2222 Attorneys for Defendant INTERNET SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. a Delaware corporation and INTERNET SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. a Georgia corporation

3

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 120

Filed 01/31/2006

Page 4 of 4

Dated: January 31, 2006 MORRIS, JAMES, HITCHENS & WILLIAMS LLP By: /s/ Mary B. Matterer Richard K. Herrmann (#405) Mary B. Matterer (#2696) 222 Delaware Avenue, 10th Floor P. O. Box 2306 Wilmington, DE 19899-2306 Telephone: (302) 888-6800 Facsimile: (302) 571-1750 Lloyd R. Day, Jr. (pro hac vice) Robert M. Galvin (pro hac vice) Paul S. Grewal (pro hac vice) Renee DuBord Brown (pro hac vice) DAY CASEBEER MADRID & BATCHELDER, LLP 20300 Stevens Creek Blvd., Suite 400 Cupertino, CA 95014 Telephone: (408) 873-0110 Facsimile: (408) 873-0220 Attorneys for Defendant SYMANTEC CORPORATION

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:__________________________ ________________________________ Honorable Sue L. Robinson United States District Court

4