Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-02907-MHP

Document 32

Filed 08/21/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

RONALD A. PETERS, Bar No. 169895 BENJAMIN A. EMMERT, Bar No. 212157 LITTLER MENDELSON A Professional Corporation 50 West San Fernando Street 15th Floor San Jose, CA 95113.2303 Telephone: 408.998.4150 Attorneys for Defendants AC SQUARE, INC., AFSHIN GHANEH, ANDREW BAHMANYAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION DANIEL KEATING-TRAYNOR on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. AC SQUARE, INC.; COMCAST INC.; AFSHIN GHANEH; ANDREW BAHMANYAR; and DOES 1 THROUGH 60, inclusive, Defendant. Case Nos.: 08-cv-2907 MHP; 08-cv-3035 MHP [CALIFORNIA ACTION NO. CIV 464144 (CONSOLIDATED BY ORDER OF COURT WITH CIV 473571] STIPULATION TO DISMISS FEDERAL COURT ACTION CASE NO. 08-CV-2907 AND EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT IN CASE NO. 08-CV-3035

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On June 11, 2008, Plaintiff filed an action in Federal Court, Case No. 08-CV-

2907, containing two causes of action under the Fair Labor Standards Act. 2. On August 11, 2008, Plaintiff filed an Amended Consolidated Complaint in

Federal Court, Case No. 08-CV-3035, containing 11 causes of action, including the two causes of action under the Fair Labor Standards Act in the previously filed action in Federal Court, Case No. 08-CV-2907. 3. Because the Amended Consolidated Complaint encompasses all of the causes

of action in the earlier filed action, Case No. 08-CV-2907, Plaintiff hereby agrees and stipulates to dismiss the complaint in Case No. 08-CV-2907 with prejudice, based on stipulation of the parties,
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 08-CV-2907 MHP AND EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT IN CASE NO. 08-CV-3035 MHP

Case 3:08-cv-02907-MHP

Document 32

Filed 08/21/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
LIT T LE R ME NDE LSO N
A P R O F E S S I ON A L C O RP O R AT I O N 50 We st Sa n F e rna ndo Stre e t 15th F loor Sa n Jose , C A 95113.2303 408. 998. 4150

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 4. The parties stipulate that this dismissal of Case No. 08-CV-2907 shall have no

effect on Plaintiff's right to pursue his claims, individually or as a putative class representative in any of the three actions already filed, including whether any of them remain in federal court or not and/or are or remain consolidated or not. 5. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties hereby agree that Defendants' time

to file responsive pleadings to Plaintiff's Amended Consolidated Complaint shall be extended until ten (10) days after the first case management conference to be held on September 15, 2008, or September 25, 2008. 6. All pending motions to dismiss will be heard on September 15, 2008, as set

forth in the Court's August 15, 2008 Order. Dated: August 21, 2008 /s/ RONALD A. PETERS BENJAMIN EMMERT LITTLER MENDELSON A Professional Corporation Attorneys for Defendants AC SQUARE, INC., AFSHIN GHANEH, ANDREW BAHMANYAR Dated: August 21, 2008 /s/ DARYL S. LANDY ANN MARIE REDING MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP Attorneys for Defendant COMCAST

2.
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 08-CV-2907 MHP AND EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT IN CASE NO. 08-CV-3035 MHP

Case 3:08-cv-02907-MHP

Document 32

Filed 08/21/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 Dated: August 21, 2008 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
LIT T LE R ME NDE LSO N
A P R O F E S S I ON A L C O RP O R AT I O N 50 We st Sa n F e rna ndo Stre e t 15th F loor Sa n Jose , C A 95113.2303 408. 998. 4150

/s/ DANIEL BERKO LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL BERKO Attorneys for Plaintiffs, DANIEL KEATINGTRAYNOR on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Firmwide:86277379.1 047098.1008 \\SJODC\HOME$\bemmert\My Documents\Stipulation to Dismiss Action.doc

3.
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 08-CV-2907 MHP AND EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT IN CASE NO. 08-CV-3035 MHP