Case 3:08-cv-02916-MHP
Document 44
Filed 08/29/2008
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LINDA K. RYBKOSKI, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated,
CASE NO. 08-cv-2916-MHP
Plaintiff(s), v.
INTERMUNE, INC., W. SCOTT HARKONEN, and GENENTECH, INC.,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Private mediation 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
To commence following a ruling on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, provider to be agreed upon by the parties.
_____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9
75 days following a ruling on the Motion to Dismiss other requested deadline _____________________________________________
8/26/08 Dated:___________
/s/ /s/ Mark J. Tamblyn 1. ____________________________ Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Attorneys for All Defendants Defendants Attorneys ____________________________ Attorney for Defendant
8/26/08 Dated:____________
Case 3:08-cv-02916-MHP
Document 44
Filed 08/29/2008
Page 2 of 2
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation." [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 9 Non-binding Arbitration 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 9 Mediation 9 Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 9 90 days from the date of this order. 75 days following a ruling on the Motion days following ruling Dismiss 9 other ___________________ the Motion to Dismiss IT IS SO ORDERED.
ER
N
D IS T IC T R
OF
A
C
LI
FO
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE l JUDGE H. Pate Marilyn Judge
R NIA
August 29, 2008 Dated:________________
DERED SO OR IT IS ___________________________________
NO
UNIT ED
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA
RT U O
RT
H