Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-mj-70358-MRGD

Document 4

Filed 06/23/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332) United States Attorney BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973) Chief, Criminal Division TAREK J. HELOU (CABN 218225) Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-7071 Facsimile: (415) 436-7234 [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) LUIGI FULVIO PALMARES AGUILAR, ) ) ) Defendant. ) )

CR No. 08-70358 BZ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER FED. R. CRIM. P. 5.1

On June 19, 2008, the parties in this case appeared before the Court for a detention hearing. At that time, the parties requested, and the Court agreed, to set a status conference on June 27. The parties stipulated that pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure ("FRCP") 5.1(d), the time limits set forth in FRCP 5.1(c) be excluded from June 19, 2008 through June 27, 2008. The // //
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Excluding Time CR 08-70358 BZ

1

Case 3:08-mj-70358-MRGD

Document 4

Filed 06/23/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

parties agreed that, taking into account the public interest in prompt disposition of criminal cases, good cause existed for this extension. SO STIPULATED: JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney

DATED: June 23, 2008

/s/ TAREK J. HELOU Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: June 23, 2008

/s/ GEOFFREY HANSEN Attorney for Defendant Margaret Pek Hoon Lim

For the reasons stated above, the Court finds that exclusion of time from June 19, 2008 through June 27, 2008 is warranted and that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(8)(A); FRCP 5.1(d). The failure to grant the requested continuance would deny the defendant effective preparation of counsel, and would result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(B)(iv).

SO ORDERED.

DATED:______________

_____________________________________ THE HONORABLE NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Excluding Time CR 08-70358 BZ

2