Free Proposed Pretrial Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 465-29

Filed 10/06/2006

Page 1 of 16

EXHIBIT 29 ISS'S PROPOSED SPECIAL VERDICT FORM You must consider each question of the Special Verdict Form and answer questions according to the instructions. INFRINGEMENT DIRECT INFRINGEMENT The `203 Patent 1. Do you find that SRI has shown by the more probable than not standard that ISS directly infringes the asserted claims of United States Patent No. 6,484,203 ("the `203 patent") by making, using, selling, or offering to sell the SiteProtector SecurityFusion Module 2.0 product (and later versions) in combination with the RealSecure Network, RealSecure Guard, RealSecure Server, RealSecure Desktop, Proventia A, Proventia G, Proventia M, Proventia Server, and Proventia Desktop products? Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 4 Claim 6 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 15 Claim 17 YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS)

2. Do you find that SRI has shown by the more probable than not standard that ISS infringes the asserted claims of United States Patent No. 6,484,203 ("the `203 patent") under the Doctrine of Equivalents by making, using, selling, or offering to sell the SiteProtector SecurityFusion Module 2.0 product (and later versions) in combination with the RealSecure Network, RealSecure Guard, RealSecure Server, RealSecure Desktop, Proventia A, Proventia G, Proventia M, Proventia Server, and Proventia Desktop products? Claim 1 Claim 12 YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS)

-1-

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 465-29

Filed 10/06/2006

Page 2 of 16

The `615 Patent 3. Do you find that SRI has shown by the more probable than not standard that ISS directly infringes the asserted claims of United States Patent No. 6,711,615 (" the `615 patent" ) by making, using, selling, or offering to sell the SiteProtector SecurityFusion Module 2.0 product (and later versions) in combination with the RealSecure Network, RealSecure Guard, RealSecure Server, RealSecure Desktop, Proventia A, Proventia G, Proventia M, Proventia Server, and Proventia Desktop products? Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 4 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 16 YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS)

4. Do you find that SRI has shown by the more probable than not standard that ISS infringes the asserted claims of United States Patent No. 6,711,615 (" the `615 patent" ) under the Doctrine of Equivalents by making, using, selling, or offering to sell the SiteProtector SecurityFusion Module 2.0 product (and later versions) in combination with the RealSecure Network, RealSecure Guard, RealSecure Server, RealSecure Desktop, Proventia A, Proventia G, Proventia M, Proventia Server, and Proventia Desktop products? Claim 1 Claim 13 YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) The `338 Patent 5. Do you find that SRI has shown by the more probable than not standard that ISS directly infringes the asserted claims of United States Patent No. 6,321,338 (" the `338 patent" ) by making, using, selling, or offering to sell the Proventia Network Anomaly Detection System product? Claim 1 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 11 Claim 12 YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS)

-2-

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 465-29

Filed 10/06/2006

Page 3 of 16

Claim 13 Claim 24

YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI)

NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS)

6. Do you find that SRI has shown by the more probable than not standard that ISS infringes the asserted claims of United States Patent No. 6,321,338 (" the `338 patent" ) under the Doctrine of Equivalents by making, using, selling, or offering to sell the Proventia Network Anomaly Detection System product? Claim 1 Claim 24 YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS)

INDUCED INFRINGEMENT 7. Do you find that SRI has shown by the more probable than not standard that ISS has actively induced its customers to infringe the `203 patent and/or the `615 patent? YES___ (finding for SRI) NO___ (finding for ISS) 8. If YES, which claims did ISS induce others to infringe? The `203 Patent Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 4 Claim 6 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 15 Claim 17 YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) The `615 Patent Claim 1 Claim 2 YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS)

-3-

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 465-29

Filed 10/06/2006

Page 4 of 16

Claim 4 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 16

YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI) YES___ (for SRI)

NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS) NO___ (for ISS)

INVALIDITY ANTICIPATION 9. Do you find that ISS has proven by the highly probable standard that any of the asserted claims are invalid as anticipated by prior art? YES___ (finding for ISS) NO___ (finding for SRI) 10. If YES, which claims? The `338 Patent Claim 1 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 24 YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) The `212 Patent Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 6 YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

-4-

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 465-29

Filed 10/06/2006

Page 5 of 16

Claim 7 Claim 8 Claim 9 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 15 Claim 16 Claim 17 Claim 18 Claim 19 Claim 20 Claim 21 Claim 22 Claim 23 Claim 24

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) The `203 Patent

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 4 Claim 6 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 15 Claim 17

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) The `615 Patent

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Claim 1

YES___ (for ISS) -5-

NO___ (for SRI)

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 465-29

Filed 10/06/2006

Page 6 of 16

Claim 2 Claim 4 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 16

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS)

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

OBVIOUSNESS 11. Do you find that ISS has proven by the highly probable standard that the subject matter of any of the asserted claims would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention? YES___ (finding for ISS) NO___ (finding for SRI) 12. If YES, which claims? The `338 Patent Claim 1 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 24 YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) The `212 Patent Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 6 YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

-6-

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 465-29

Filed 10/06/2006

Page 7 of 16

Claim 7 Claim 8 Claim 9 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 15 Claim 16 Claim 17 Claim 18 Claim 19 Claim 20 Claim 21 Claim 22 Claim 23 Claim 24

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) The `203 Patent

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 4 Claim 6 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 15 Claim 17

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) The `615 Patent

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Claim 1

YES___ (for ISS) -7-

NO___ (for SRI)

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 465-29

Filed 10/06/2006

Page 8 of 16

Claim 2 Claim 4 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 16

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS)

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

ENABLEMENT 13. Do you find that ISS has proven by the highly probable standard that any of the asserted claims are invalid for lack of enablement? YES___ (finding for ISS) NO___ (finding for SRI) 14. If YES, which claims? The `338 Patent Claim 1 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 24 YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) The `212 Patent Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 6 Claim 7 YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) -8NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 465-29

Filed 10/06/2006

Page 9 of 16

Claim 8 Claim 9 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 15 Claim 16 Claim 17 Claim 18 Claim 19 Claim 20 Claim 21 Claim 22 Claim 23 Claim 24

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) The `203 Patent

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 4 Claim 6 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 15 Claim 17

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) The `615 Patent

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Claim 1 Claim 2

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) -9-

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 465-29

Filed 10/06/2006

Page 10 of 16

Claim 4 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 16

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS)

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

WRITTEN DESCRIPTION 15. Do you find that ISS has proven by the highly probable standard that any of the asserted claims are invalid for lack of an adequate written description? YES___ (finding for ISS) NO___ (finding for SRI) 16. If YES, which claims? The `338 Patent Claim 1 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 24 YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) The `212 Patent Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 6 Claim 7 Claim 8 YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) - 10 NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 465-29

Filed 10/06/2006

Page 11 of 16

Claim 9 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 15 Claim 16 Claim 17 Claim 18 Claim 19 Claim 20 Claim 21 Claim 22 Claim 23 Claim 24

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) The `203 Patent

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 4 Claim 6 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 15 Claim 17

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) The `615 Patent

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 4

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) - 11 -

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 465-29

Filed 10/06/2006

Page 12 of 16

Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 16

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS)

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

BEST MODE 17. Do you find that ISS has proven by the highly probable standard that any of the asserted claims are invalid because the named inventors failed to adequately disclose their best mode for practicing the claimed inventions? YES___ (finding for ISS) NO___ (finding for SRI) 18. If YES, which claims? The `338 Patent Claim 1 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 24 YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) The `212 Patent Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 6 Claim 7 Claim 8 YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

- 12 -

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 465-29

Filed 10/06/2006

Page 13 of 16

Claim 9 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 15 Claim 16 Claim 17 Claim 18 Claim 19 Claim 20 Claim 21 Claim 22 Claim 23 Claim 24

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) The `203 Patent

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 4 Claim 6 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 15 Claim 17

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) The `615 Patent

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 4

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) - 13 -

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 465-29

Filed 10/06/2006

Page 14 of 16

Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 16

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS)

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

DEFINITENESS 19. Do you find that ISS has proven by the highly probable standard that any of the claims are invalid because the language of the claims is indefinite? YES___ (finding for ISS) NO___ (finding for SRI) 20. If YES, which claims? The `338 Patent Claim 1 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 24 YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) The `212 Patent Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 6 Claim 7 Claim 8 Claim 9 YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) - 14 NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 465-29

Filed 10/06/2006

Page 15 of 16

Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 14 Claim 15 Claim 16 Claim 17 Claim 18 Claim 19 Claim 20 Claim 21 Claim 22 Claim 23 Claim 24

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) The `203 Patent

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 4 Claim 6 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 15 Claim 17

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) The `615 Patent

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 4 Claim 13

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS) - 15 -

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR

Document 465-29

Filed 10/06/2006

Page 16 of 16

Claim 14 Claim 16

YES___ (for ISS) YES___ (for ISS)

NO___ (for SRI) NO___ (for SRI)

- 16 -