Free Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

A Case 1 :04-cv-01 199-SLR Document 509 Filed 05/20/2008 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
SRI INTERNATIONAL, INC., )
a California Corporation, )
)
i Plaintiff and )
Cotmterelaim-Defendaiit, )
g ) C.A. No. 04-1199 (SLR)
V- )
)
INTERNET SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., ) PUBLIC VERSION
5 a Delaware Corporation, INTERNET )
SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., a Georgia )
Corporation, and SYMANTEC )
CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, )
)
Defendants and )
Counterclaim—Plaintiffs. )
Q LETTER TO THE HONORABLE SUE L. ROBINSON DATED MAY 13, 2008
PART 1 OF 2
Richard L. Horwitz (#2246)
David E. Moore (#3983)
POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
ec: Clerk of the Court Hercules Plaza 6th Floor
_ 1313 N. Market Street
; Counsel of Record Wilmington, DE 19801
_ Tel: (302) 984-6000
{ [email protected]
, dmoore@,,n_ottera1i.derson.com
Attorneys for Dezfendonts
INTERNET SECURITY SYSTEMS INC.,
_ o Delaware corporation; and
. INTERNETSECURITYSYSTEMS INC.,
; o Georgia corporation

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR Document 509 Filed 05/20/2008 Page 2 of 3
ner
_And@rSOn Rieha rd L. Horwitz
Corroon LLP fgjttt
orney at Law
1313 North Market Street [email protected]
P.O. Box 951 302 984-6027 Direct Phone
Wilmington, DE 19899—095l 302 658-1192 Fax
302 984-6000
www.potteranderson.com
1 May 13, 2008
Public Version Dated: May 20, 2008
A VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
The Honorable Sue L. Robinson PUBLIC VERSION
` J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building
; 844 N. King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re: SRI International, Inc. v. Internet Security Systems , etal.
C.A. No. 04-1199-SLR
Dear Judge Robinson:
` Pursuant to the Court’s request at the April 29, 2008 status conference, ISS is providing
the Court with that portion of the existing summary judgment record in this case that pertains to
i De1’endants’ allegation that the asserted claims ofthe ‘338 patent are anticipated by the JfNao
y reference. In particular, the following documents are enclosed:
1. The original Joint Motion of Defendants ISS and Symantec for Summary Judgment of
A invalidity Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 & 103 (D.I. 297) (“Joint Motion") tiled June I6, 2006,
attached as Exhibit i;
2. A redacted version of Det`endants’ opening brief in support ofthe Joint Motion (DJ.
E 299), attached as Exhibit 2;
3. A redacted version of Dei`endants’ reply brief in support ofthe Joint Motion (DI.
400), attached as Exhibit 3; and
4. Relevant portions ofthe supporting Declaration of Renee DuBord Brown (D,}. 301),
attached as Exhibit 4 (with Exhibits A-OO).
I Co-defendant Symantec Corporation will be submitting the portion of the summary
judgment record pertaining to Defendant? allegation that the asserted claims ofthe ‘203 and
‘615 patents were obvious in iight of EMERALD 1997 and Intrusive Activity 1991. Both ISS and
Symantec discussed these invalidity arguments in recent letters to the Court on April 25, 2008
(D.l. 500) and April 29, 2008 (DJ. 50l) and during the April 29, 2008 status conference. Per the

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR Document 509 Filed 05/20/2008 Page 3 of 3
The Honorable Sue L. Robinson
May 13, 2008
Public Version Dated: May 20, 2008
Page 2
( Court’s instruction, ISS has not submitted any materials from the recent record, however, shouid
the Court deem those materials necessary for review, ISS will provide them.
ISS appreciates the Court’s further consideration of these issues and is pleased to provide
I further documentation or answer any additional questions if needed.
Respectfully,
/s/ Richard L. Horwitz
Richard L. Horwitz
fmsb
865413 J 28434
co: Clerk ofthe Court (via hand delivery)
Counsel of Record (via electronic mail)