Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 88.8 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 723 Words, 4,727 Characters
Page Size: 622 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8551/92.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 88.8 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :04-cv-01 199-SLR Document 92 Filed 12/07/2005 Page 1 of 3
tter
A1'1(I€I`SOl}
COIT 00],1 LLP Richard L. Horwitz
Partner
_ _ _ Attorney at Law
Lili N""i‘ t"'¤rl<·>*t i’“""" [email protected]
P0 Bus 9::1 an ssoeczv oimetrime
Wiln1ing1nn,DE, “i9899-095% 302 658·li92 Fax
sc? 984 6000
\\'\\'\\2|)ll[IUl'{lll{il‘l'!·il)H`(TUIII
December 7, 2005
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
Honorable Sue L. Robinson
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building
844 N. King Street
Room 6124
Lockbox 31
Wilmington, DE 19801
Rc: C.A. N0. 04-1199-SLR
SRI International, Inc. v. Internet Security Systems, a Georgia
corporation, Internet Security Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
and Symantec Corporation.
Dear Chief Judge Robinson:
ln advance ofthe in-person discovery status conference in C.A. No. 04·~l l99-SLR
scheduled for today at 4:30 pm., the parties submit the following list of proposed discovery
issues for the Court’s consideration.
SRI International, Inc. ("SRI’9:
• Whether Symantec should be required to provide customer information.
• Symantec’s objections to providing information regarding its intrusion detection,
prevention, and/or analysis products that have not been specifically identitied as “accused
products?
Internet Security Systems, Inc., a Georgia corporation (“ISS-GA ’U and Internet Security
Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“ISS—DE’U:
• Whether the confidential designations on certain documents produced by SRI are
proper.

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR Document 92 Filed 12/07/2005 Page 2 of 3
Honorable Sue L. Robinson
December 7, 2005
Page 2
• Whether SRI should be required to supplement its response to lSS·GA’s
Interrogatory No. 7 concerning conception ofthe alleged inventions ofthe patents—in—suit.
• Whether SRI should be required to supplement it response to ISS-C=A’s
lnterrogatory No. 8 concerning the commercialization ofthe alleged inventions of the patents»in—
suit.
• Approval of the parties’ stipulation that adding and responding to additional
allegations of inequitahle conduct may be done through supplementation of interrogatory
responses without formal amendment of the pleadings.
• Whether the December 30, 2005 deadline for motions to amend the pleadings
should be extended with respect to adding further allegations ofinequitable conduct.
Symantec Corporation ("Synmm‘ec’D:
• Whether SRI should be required to supplement its response to Symantec's
Interrogatory No. 4 concerning conception of the alleged inventions ofthe patents—in—suit.
• Whether Symantec should be required to provide discovery on products for which
SRI has failed to provide infringement contentions in response to Symanteds Interrogatory No.
13.
Respecg”uI/y .s1rbmitten1
/s/' Jo/m F1 Horvath /s/ Ric/mrd L, Horwitz
Timothy Devlin (#424I) Richard L. 1·Io1witz(#2246)
J olm F1 Horvath (#455 7) David E. Moore (#3983)
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.. POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
919 N. Market St., Ste. l 100 Hercules Plaza, 6m Floor
P.O. Box 1114 1313 N,. Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19889-11 14 P.O. Box 951
Tel.: (302) 652-5070 Wilmington, DE 19899
Fax.: (302) 652-0607 Tel.: (302) 984-6000
Fax.: (302) 658-1192

Case 1:04-cv-01199-SLR Document 92 Filed 12/07/2005 Page 3 of 3
I·ionorable Sue L. Robinson
December 7, 2005
Page 3
OF COUNSEL OF COUNSEL
Howard G. Pollack (CA Bar No,. 162897) Holmes I. Hawkins Ill
Gina M. Steele (CA Bar No. 233379) Natasha H. Moffitt
Katherine D. Prescott (CA Bar No. 215496) KING & SPALDING LLP
Michael J. Curley (CA Bar No. 230343) 391 Peachtree Street
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Atlanta, GA 30303
500 Arguelio Street, Suite 500 Tel.: (404) 572-4600
Redwood City, California 94063 Fax.: (404) 572-5100
Tel.: (650) 839-5070
Fax.: (650) 839-5071 Theresa A. Moehlman
Jeffrey D. Blake
Attorneys for Plaintiff KING & SPALDING LLP
SRI INT ERNA T IONAL, INC. 1185 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Tel.: (212) 556-2I00
Fax.: (2i2) 541-5306
Attorneys for Deferularzrs
INTERNET SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.,
cz Georgia Corporation and
INTERNET SECURITY S YSTEMS, INC,
a Delaware Corporation.
/s/ Ric/`mrd K. Herrmann
Richard K. Herrmann (#406)
MORRIS JAMES I-IETCI-IENS & WILLIAMS LLP
222 Delaware Avenue, 10th Floor
P.O. Box 23 06
Wilmington, DE 19899
Tel.: (302) 888-6800
Pax.: (302) 571-1750
OF COUNSEL
Lloyd R. Day, Jr.
Robert M. Galvin
Paul S. Grewal
DAY CASEBEER MADRID & BATCHELDER LLP
20300 Stevens Creek Blvd., Suite 400
Cupertino, CA 95014
Tel.: (408) 873-0110
Fax.: (408) 873-0220
Attorneys for Defendant
SYAMNTEC CORPORATION