Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :04-cv-01207-GIVIS Document 108 Filed O4/O3/2006 Page 1 of 2
MONTGO M ERY, MCCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP
ATTO R N Evs AT LAW
R|gHARp MQN1-GOMERY 300 DELAWARE AVENUE, SUITE 750 I2i$¤¤TH BROAPETREET
¤¤~AL¤$¤~ W·L~·~GT¤~~ DE ·9E¤· p...Z§§;tiS.1TE·i .3129
A¤r·11·r·rE¤ IN DELAWARE, PENNSYLVANIA & NEw 302-504-7 BOO 2l5_772_| 500
JERSEY FAx 302-504-7820 FAx 2 1 5-772-7620
DIRECT DIAI- LIBERTYVIEW
3OE·504--7840 457 HADDONFIELD ROAD, SUITE 600
CHERRY HILL, NJ 08002
[email protected] eee-4ee-7 700
FAx 856-488-7 7 20
l235 WESTLAKES DRIVE, SUITE 200
BERWYN, PA l93I2
sto-eee-zz no
FAx euo-eee-aaao
April 3, 2006
Via CM/ECF Filing and Hand Delivery
The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet
United States District Court
District of Delaware
844 King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re: Price v. Chaffinch, No. 04-956-GMS
Foraker v. Chaffinch, N0. 04-1207-GMS
Revisions to Binders of Defendants’ Contested Exhibits
Dear Judge Sleet:
As part of their obligation to file the parties’ proposed Final Pretrial Orders in the above
referenced cases, Plaintiffs filed with this Court two sets of binders containing copies of
Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ contested exhibits. There are two problems with the binders of
Defendants’ contested exhibits that Plaintiffs’ counsel have asked us to correct:
First, the documents under tabs 34, 35, 36, and 37 are the wrong documents; i. e., they are
not the ones that Defendants have marked as "D34," "D35," "D36," and "D37." Accordingly,
we enclose complete and accurate copies of defense exhibits D34 through D37.
Second, Defendants’ Exhibits D65 — D73 have been filed under the incorrect number
tabs. For example, the exhibit that Defendants have marked as "D65" is under tab 66; "D66" is
under tab 67; "D67" is under tab 68, and so on.

Case 1 :04-cv—O1207-GIVIS Document 108 Filed O4/O3/2006 Page 2 of 2
M0N·rGoMERY, McCRAcKzN, WALKER 8. RH0A¤s, LLP
The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet
April 3, 2006
Page 2
Consistent with instructions given to Plaintiffs’ counsel by Chambers (as relayed to us by
Plaintiffs’ counsel), we are available to make the necessary changes to the binder of Defendants’
exhibits if it would be helpful to the Court. We thank the Court for this accommodation and its
ongoing patience; we hope in the future to resolve matters such as this among counsel prior to
tiling.
Re ct lly yours,
1 »»»——
Richard M. Donaldson
cc: Thomas S. Neuberger, Esq. (w/encls. via CM/ECF tiling and U.S. mail)
Stephen J. Neuberger, Esq. (w/encls. via CM/ECF filing and U.S. mail)
Martin D. Haverly, Esq. (w/encls. via CM/ECF tiling and U.S. mail)