Free Motion for Settlement - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-01231-SLR

Document 144-2

Filed 04/26/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ____________________________________ VERSUS TECHNOLOGY, INC. Plaintiff, v. RADIANSE, INC. Defendant. ____________________________________

: : : : : : : : : :

C. A. NO. 04-1231-SLR

CONSENT JUDGMENT AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. action. 2. U.S. Patent No. 6,154,139 ( `139 patent"), duly and legally issued on "the This Court has jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this

November 28, 2000 to Alan C. Heller, for an invention entitled "Method and System for Locating Subjects within a Tracking Environment", is valid and legally enforceable by Versus, the assignee, and the Patent remains valid and enforceable. 3. U.S. Reissue Patent No. Re. 36,791 ("the `791 patent ), duly and legally issued "

on July 25, 2000 to Alan C. Heller, for an invention entitled "Location System Adapted For Use In Multipath Environments", is valid and legally enforceable by Versus, the exclusive licensee, and the Patent remains valid and enforceable. 4. U.S. Patent No. 5,572,195 ( `195 patent"), duly and legally issued on "the

November 5, 1996 to Alan C. Heller, for an invention entitled "Sensory and Control System for Local Area Networks is valid and legally enforceable by Versus, the exclusive licensee, ", and the Patent remains valid and enforceable. 5. U.S. Patent No. 5,027,314 ( `314 patent"), duly and legally issued on June "the

25, 1991 to Gary Linwood and Wayne Duncan, for an invention entitled "Apparatus and

Case 1:04-cv-01231-SLR

Document 144-2

Filed 04/26/2006

Page 2 of 2

Method for Position Reporting is valid and legally enforceable by Versus, the assignee, and ", the Patent remains valid and enforceable. 6. with prejudice. 7. 8. Each party will bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement All claims and counterclaims in this action between the parties are dismissed

between these parties, finally executed April 20, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Enter: _________________, 2006 _________________________________ United States District Judge