Free Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting - District Court of California - California


File Size: 164.6 kB
Pages: 5
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 784 Words, 4,687 Characters
Page Size: 613 x 779 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/258215/6.pdf

Download Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting - District Court of California ( 164.6 kB)


Preview Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-02145-H-POR

Document 6

Filed 02/15/2008

Page 1 of 5

2 3 4 5 6 7

JOHN M. KIM (Bar No. 188997) IP LEGAL ADVISORS, P.C. 1940 Garnet Avenue, Suite 230 San Diego, CA 92109 Tel: (858) 272-0220 Fax: (858) 272-0221 Attorney for Defendant HD INSTALL SOLUTIONS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIi.
9

10 11 12

BRANDON WALSH dba SO CAL INSTALLS

JOINT DISCOVE:~Y PLAN PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RlLE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 26()
HD INSTALL SOLUTIONS, INC., a California corporation; SO CAL INSTALL; ENRIQUE E. SANTOYO, as in individual; BR YAN AYL WARD, as an individual and DOES 1-20 inclusive,

13
14

15 16 17 18

ยท11-------------------'

Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ::ounsel for the paIiies, and John

19 Todd Atkins for Plaintiff BRANDON WALSH dba SO CAL INSTAL LS("Plaintiff') 20 21 22 23

M. Kim for Defendant HD INSTALL SOLUTIONS, INC. ("Defendan ") conferred on January 31, 2008 regarding a discovery plan in this matter. Counsel discussed' he nature and basis of their respective claims and defenses and the possibility of settlement. (:ounsel propose the following discovery plan:

25 26

of documents and percipient witnesses required by Rule 26(a)(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by no later than February 20, 2008.

27 IIIII

28

Case 3:07-cv-02145-H-POR

Document 6

Filed 02/15/2008

Page 2 of 5

2. 2

Cut-off Date to Amend Pleadings.

The pmiies propc se that the last day to join

other parties or to amend the pleadings be August 14,2008.

Geographic scope of use in the l nited States by the paliies of their respective marks and the dates of first use of such

Actual confusion experienced by 1:oth parties, if any; Expert evaluations of liability and iamages.

required reports be served on or before November 10, 2008. The initial expert disclosures wi]I address all liability and damages issues for which that pal ty bears the initial burden of proof. Responding expeli dis ~Iosures and any required 10, 2008.

reports will be served on or be fore December

Expert witness discovery will b<: concluded on or before
2
Joint Discovery Plan

Case 3:07-cv-02145-H-POR

Document 6

Filed 02/15/2008

Page 3 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 c.
IV.
lll.

January 8, 2009. The parties propose that the filIal lists of witnesses and exhibits under Rule 26(a)(3) h: due from Plaintiff and Defendant by March 19, 2009 anc the parties should have 14 days after service of final lists o' witnesses and exhibits to list objections. The parties request a pretrial conf, rence in May 2009. The case should be ready for tricl by June 10, 2009 and at this time is expected to take appro dmately 5-6 days plus jury selection time. Discovery Limitations. The pmiies propose that the discovery limitations

v.

set fOlih in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall apply to depositi')l1s and written discovery. The parties anticipate that most of the depositions shall be limited in time as set forth by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; however, certain individuals (e.g. ex}erts) may require more deposition time. Therefore the parties agree to consider requests for additional time when requested. The parties further agree that a protective order be in ph.ce for the treatment of confidential information. The pmiies will draft a proposed order and p 'ovide it to the COUlifor approval. Settlement is likely to be enhanced by the use of the folowing resolution procedure: Mediation or Settlement Conference. Dated: February 15,2008 alternative dispute

26
27

28

Case 3:07-cv-02145-H-POR

Document 6

Filed 02/15/2008

Page 4 of 5

By
TaD ATKINS Attorney for Plaintiff BRANDON WALSH :lba SO CAL INSTALLS

Case 3:07-cv-02145-H-POR

Document 6

Filed 02/15/2008

Page 5 of 5

2 3

I am employed in the County of San Diego, State of California I am over the age of eighteen and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1940 Gamet Avenue, Suite 230, San Diego, California 92109. I hereby certify that on February 15,2008, I electronically filec the following JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIV[L PROCEDURE 26(1) with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will send noti fication of such filing to the following parties: Todd Atkins, Esq. Atkins & Davidson 450 B Street, Suite 1430 San Diego, California 92101

5 6 7 8 9

Attorneys for Plaj 'ntiff
Brandon Walsh dha SO CAL INSTALLS

11 12

XD (Federal): I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. EXECUTED ON February 15,2008 at San Diego, California

cfJaJ1J(7--.=f:) /
Patti Windham