Free Discrepancy Order Accepting Document - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cr-03017-JLS

Document 34

Filed 02/05/2008

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES CASE NO.: 07-CR-3017-JLS E-FILED DATE: 02/05/2008 DOCUMENT TITLE: CASE TITLE: USA v. Ontiveros, et al. DOCUMENT NOs.: 27 through 29, 31, and 32

Sentence Summary Chart (Doc. No. 27); Sentence Memorandum (Doc. No. 28); Motion to Adjust Downward in Criminal History Category (Doc. No. 29); Motion for Downward Departure Based on a Combination of Circumstances (Doc. No. 31); Motion to Depart Downward Because of Aberrant Behavior (Doc. No. 32) Defendant Daniel Ontiveros

DOCUMENT FILED BY:

Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted:
Local Rule or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

Discrepancy

ECF § 2(h) ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(g) ECF § 2(f) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Crim. L. Rule 47.1 X Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Crim. L. Rule 32.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Crim. L. Rule 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Crim. L. Rule 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Civ. L. Rule 15.1 Civ. L. Rule 30.1

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document filed Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Lacking proper signature Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/Document(s) are not timely Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing table of contents Amended pleading not complete in itself Depositions not accepted absent a court order Supplemental documents require court order

Electronic Document Discrepancy Notice and Order Page 1 of 2

07cr3017

Case 3:07-cr-03017-JLS OTHER:

Document 34

Filed 02/05/2008

Page 2 of 2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: X The documents are accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record and serve a copy of this order on all parties.

Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1.

DATED: February 5, 2008 Honorable Janis L. Sammartino United States District Judge

Electronic Document Discrepancy Notice and Order Page 2 of 2

07cr3017