Free Motion to Admit Videotape - District Court of California - California


File Size: 28.3 kB
Pages: 1
Date: November 19, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 299 Words, 1,741 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/258563/11-4.pdf

Download Motion to Admit Videotape - District Court of California ( 28.3 kB)


Preview Motion to Admit Videotape - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cr-03116-LAB

Document 11-4

Filed 11/19/2007

Page 1 of 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Case Name: United States of America vs. Blanca Estrella-Moran Venue: United States of District Court, Southern District of California Case No. 07-3116-LAB PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO I am employed in the county of San Diego, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years, not a party to the within action. My business address is 2044 First Avenue, Ste., 200, San Diego, California 92101. On November 19, 2007, I served the following documents described as:

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [X] (BY MAIL, 1013A, 2015.5 C.C.P.) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 s/Linda A. King_______________ Linda A. King Attorney for Material Witness [X] I deposited each such envelope in the mail at San Diego, California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Executed on November 19, 2007, at San Diego, California.
·

Motion & Order to Exonerate Mat Wit's Bond on all interested parties in this action by placing (X) a true copy [ ] the original thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes address as following: Karen Hewitt & her representative United States Attorney Office of the United States Attorney 880 Front Street, Room 6293 San Diego, CA 92101
·

[email protected] FAX (619) 235-2757

Jodi D Thorp [email protected],[email protected] U S Attorney CR [email protected]

[X] (BY FACSIMILE) The facsimile machine I used complied with Rule 2003(3) and no error was reported by the machine. Pursuant to rule 2008(e)(4), I caused the machine to print a record of the transmission.