Case 3:07-cv-02174-H-BLM
Document 16
Filed 12/10/2007
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
07 CV 2174
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL SHAMES; GARY GRAMKOW, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of all persons similarly situated,, Plaintiffs, v. THE HERTZ CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.
Case No. 07 CV 2174 H BLM [Class Action] ORDER ON JOINT MOTION REGARDING DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT
Case 3:07-cv-02174-H-BLM
Document 16
Filed 12/10/2007
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2008.
The Court has considered the parties' joint motion regarding the timing of defendants' response to the complaint, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby orders: 1. Defendants' responses to the complaint shall be filed no later than January 25,
2.
In the event any of the defendants files a motion to dismiss the complaint,
plaintiffs shall have no less than twenty-eight (28) days to file their opposition to such motions, and defendants shall have no less than fourteen (14) days thereafter to file their replies, if any, in support of such motions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 10, 2007 ___________________________________ Honorable Marilyn L. Huff United States District Judge
COPIES TO: All Parties of Record
07 CV 2174
-2-