Free Discrepancy Order Rejecting Document - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-02205-DMS-CAB

Document 11

Filed 03/10/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: CASE TITLE: E-FILED DATE: DOCUMENT TITLE: DOCUMENT FILED BY: 07cv2205 DMS (CAB) Hagen v. NCR Corporation DOCKET NOS.: 9, 10 3/7/2008 Joint Motion for Discovery/Joint Motion to Withdraw Jason Dawson

Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: X
Civil Local Rule or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures M anual provision ("ECF")

Discrepancy

ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(d) ECF § 2(f)

ECF § 2(g) ECF § 2(h) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Civ. L. Rule 15.1 X IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed Lacking certificate of service Lacking proper signature **Document purports to be a "Joint Motion" but contains only one attorney's signature. Nor does the document contain a certification by the filer as required by ECF § 2(f)(4).** Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/Document(s) are not timely Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing table of contents Amended pleading not complete in itself OTHER: Discovery plan to be submitted directly to chambers, not filed. Motion requesting to withdraw prior filing is moot because filing is stricken.

X

The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the documents from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties.

Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1. DATED: March 10, 2008

CATHY ANN BENCIVENGO United States Magistrate Judge