Free Motion to Stay - District Court of California - California


File Size: 15.0 kB
Pages: 3
Date: August 13, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 867 Words, 5,379 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/258974/26.pdf

Download Motion to Stay - District Court of California ( 15.0 kB)


Preview Motion to Stay - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-02237-JLS-WMC

Document 26

Filed 08/13/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

KAREN P. HEWITT United States Attorney RAVEN M. NORRIS Assistant U.S. Attorney California State Bar No. 232868 United States Attorney's Office 880 Front Street, Room 6293 San Diego, California 92101-8893 Telephone: (619) 557-7157 Facsimile: (619) 557-5004 Attorneys for the Respondents UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN JOSE MARTINEZ-MADERA, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On November 26, 2007, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Appointment of Counsel, commencing this action. To date, the parties have submitted their briefs for decision in this case and the matter is currently under submission before this Court. On July 25, 2008, the Court of Appeals of for the Ninth Circuit issued decisions in Casas-Castrillon v. DHS, -- F.3d --, 2008 WL 2902026 (9th Cir. July 25, 2008) and Prieto-Romero v. Clark, -- F.3d --, 2008 WL 2853396, at 3, Fn. 5 (9th Cir. July 25, 2008), which have bearing on this case. According to the Ninth Circuit decisions, a detained petitioner who was subject to mandatory detention pending administrative proceedings may be entitled to bond review before an IJ pending a petition for review and a stay of removal. See Prieto-Romero, 2008 WL 2853396; Casas-Castrillon, 2008 WL 2902026. Further, the decisions held that 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) governs detention pending a petition for review and stay of removal. It is the Government's position that the Immigration Court and the BIA have bond review jurisdiction when the Department of Homeland Security ("DHS") exercises its bond authority under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). See 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.1(b)(7), 1003.38, 1236.1(d). ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of) Department of Homeland Security, et al.,) ) Respondents. ) ___________________________________ ) Civil No. 07 cv 2237 JLS (WMc) EX PARTE REQUEST TO HOLD CASE IN ABEYANCE AND ORDER STATUS REPORT

Case 3:07-cv-02237-JLS-WMC

Document 26

Filed 08/13/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Therefore, Petitioner may submit a written request to the Immigration Court for a bond hearing pursuant to Casas-Castrillon in accordance the procedures outlined in the Immigration Court Practice Manual. See Immigration Court Practice Manual available at http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir. Accordingly, in light of Casas and Prieto and ongoing efforts to implement the decisions,1/ and without waiving the Government's defenses in this action, including the Government's position that if an IJ denies bond or sets a bond that Mr. Martinez-Madera is unable to post, DHS has authority to continue his detention. See Prieto-Romero, 2008 WL 2853396, at * 6 (holding that, after procedural due process is satisfied, prolonged detention is authorized if a petitioner faces a "significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future because the government can repatriate him to [his native country] if his pending bid for judicial relief . . . proves unsuccessful."), the Government respectfully requests that this Court hold these proceedings in abeyance and order the filing of a status report in sixty days to allow Petitioner opportunity to seek and obtain bond review before the Immigration Court and, in the event of an appeal, the BIA. Dated: August 13, 2008 Respectfully submitted,

KAREN P. HEWITT United States Attorney s/ Raven M. Norris RAVEN M. NORRIS Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Respondents Email: [email protected]

This Office and the Office of Immigration Litigation in Washington, D.C., have been coordinating with the Executive Office for Immigration Review ("EOIR"), which manages the IJs and the BIA, concerning implementation of the recent decisions. 2
07CV2237

1/

Case 3:07-cv-02237-JLS-WMC

Document 26

Filed 08/13/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JUAN JOSE MARTINEZ-MADERA, ) ) ) Petitioner, v. ) ) MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary, ) Department of Homeland Security; et al, ) ) ) Respondents. _____________________________________ ) IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED THAT: Civil No. 07 cv 2237 JLS (WMC) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 22 Executed on August 13, 2008 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 s/ Raven M. Norris RAVEN M. NORRIS the last known address, at which place there is delivery service of mail from the United States Postal Service. Juan Jose Martinez-Madera A14-647-093 ICE El Centro Detention Center 1115 N. Imperial Ave. El Centro, CA 92243 I am not a party to the above-entitled action. I have caused service of the Ex Parte Request to hold proceedings in abeyance and order status report on the following parties by electronically filing the foregoing with the Clerk of the District Court using its ECF System, which electronically notifies them. None I hereby certify that I have caused to be mailed the foregoing, by the United States Postal Service, to the following non-ECF participants on this case: I, Raven M. Norris, am a citizen of the United States and am at least eighteen years of age. My business address is 880 Front Street, Room 6293, San Diego, California 92101-8893.

07CV2237