Free Discrepancy Order Accepting Document - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cr-03198-JLS

Document 17

Filed 03/06/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES CASE NO.: E-FILED DATE: DOCUMENT TITLE: DOCUMENT FILED BY: 07-CR-3198-JLS 03/05/2008 Sentencing Summary Chart Defendant CASE TITLE: DOCUMENT NOs.: USA v. Rosales-Contreras 15 & 16

Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted:
Local Rule or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

Discrepancy

ECF § 2(h) ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(g) ECF § 2(f) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Crim. L. Rule 47.1 X Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Crim. L. Rule 32.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Crim. L. Rule 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Crim. L. Rule 47.1

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document filed Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Lacking proper signature Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/Document(s) are not timely Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Supplemental documents require court order

X IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: X

OTHER: Single documents should be filed in one docket entry.

The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record and serve a copy of this order on all parties.

Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1. DATED: March 6, 2008 Honorable Janis L. Sammartino United States District Judge