Free Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California - California


File Size: 70.7 kB
Pages: 1
Date: May 27, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 333 Words, 2,085 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/259220/26.pdf

Download Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California ( 70.7 kB)


Preview Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-02266-LAB-CAB

Document 26

Filed 05/27/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: CASE TITLE: E-FILED DATE: DOCUMENT TITLE: DOCUMENT FILED BY: 07cv2266-LAB (CAB) Erickson v. M/V CF 6290 TJ DOCKET NOS.: 5/25/08 Declaration of Jim Hansen Roger Haskell

24

Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: X
Civil Local Rule or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures M anual provision ("ECF")

Discrepancy

X

X

ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(d) ECF § 2(f) ECF § 2(g) ECF § 2(h) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Civ. L. Rule 15.1

Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed Lacking certificate of service Lacking proper signature Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation. **Document is not in pleading format** Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/Document(s) are not timely Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing table of contents Amended pleading not complete in itself OTHER:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the documents from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties. ***Counsel shall file a proper declaration with a proof of service immediately.***

X

Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1. DATED: May 27, 2008

CATHY ANN BENCIVENGO United States Magistrate Judge