Free Proposed Pretrial Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 30.5 kB
Pages: 2
Date: March 31, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 349 Words, 2,185 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8610/298-3.pdf

Download Proposed Pretrial Order - District Court of Delaware ( 30.5 kB)


Preview Proposed Pretrial Order - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-01258-SLR

Document 298-3

Filed 04/01/2006

Page 1 of 2

EXHIBIT 2 McKESSON' STATEMENT OF DISPUTED S ISSUES OF FACT THAT REMAIN TO BE LITIGATED

McKesson identifies the following disputed issues of fact that remain to be litigated in the jury trial on infringement, damages and willfulness. Because the Court has directed that TriZetto'equitable defenses be tried to the Court after the jury trial and because such s bench trial has not yet been scheduled, McKesson reserves the right to identify disputed issues of fact that remain to be litigated in said bench trial in accordance with the schedule to be set by the Court. To the extent that McKesson'Statement of Disputed Issues of s Law contains issues of fact, those issues are incorporated herein by reference. I. INFRINGEMENT A. Whether TriZetto has infringed claims 1-6 and 8-16 of the ` patent, 164

either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by its manufacture, use, offer to sell, or sale of Facets, ClaimFacts, and QicLink. B. Whether TriZetto has contributed to the infringement of claims 1-6 and 8-

16 of the ` patent in connection with the use of Facets, ClaimFacts and QicLink by 164 others. C. Whether TriZetto has induced the infringement of claims 1-6 and 8-16 of

the ` patent in connection with the use of Facets, ClaimFacts and QicLink by others. 164 D. II. Whether TriZetto'infringement of the ` patent has been willful. s 164

RELIEF A. The amount of damages sufficient to compensate McKesson for TriZetto' s

infringement of the ` patent. 164

1

Case 1:04-cv-01258-SLR

Document 298-3

Filed 04/01/2006

Page 2 of 2

B.

Whether McKesson is entitled to enhanced damages for TriZetto'willful s

infringement of the ` patent. 164 C. Whether McKesson is entitled to an injunction against further infringement

of the ` patent by TriZetto and third parties with notice. 164 D. Whether McKesson is entitled to prejudgment interest for TriZetto' s

infringement of the ` patent. 164 E. Whether McKesson is entitled to receive compensation for the attorneys'

fees it incurred in prosecuting this action. F. Whether McKesson is entitled to costs incurred in prosecuting this action.

2