Free Reply - District Court of California - California


File Size: 546.7 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 862 Words, 5,147 Characters
Page Size: 610.56 x 842.88 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/260280/38.pdf

Download Reply - District Court of California ( 546.7 kB)


Preview Reply - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-02391-JAH-POR

Document 38

Filed 03/13/2008

Page 1 of 3

1

2 3

4
5 6
~

RONALD MARTINETTI, ESQ. State Bar No.106 898 KAZANJIAN & MARTINETfI 520 East Wilson Avenue Glendale, California 91206 Tel.818-241-1011 FAX 818-241-2193 E-Mail [email protected]

Attorneys for Defendants Lee's General Toys, Inc., and John Lee

8 9

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 13

14
15

)

GEORGIA-P ACIFIC CONSUMER PRODUCTS LP, a Delaware limited partnership,

CASE. NO.07 CV 2391 (JAR POR)
DEFENDANTS OBJECTIONS TO DECLARATION OF GEORGE HALCON FILED IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF GEORGIAPACIFIC'S REPL Y TO OPPOSITION TO S:UPPLEMENT AL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

) ) )

16
17

Plaintiff.
vs.

18 19
LEE'S

) GENERAL JOHN 1-10, TOYS, INC., a California) and ) ) corporation, DOES LEE, an individual;

20
21

) Defendants.

22 23 24
25

Defendants Lee's General Toys, Inc. and John Lee respectfully object to the Declaration of George Halcon Filed in Support of Plaintiff Georgia-Pacific's Reply to Opposition to
Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction: A

26 27 28
1

Case 3:07-cv-02391-JAH-POR

Document 38

Filed 03/13/2008

Page 2 of 3

.Defendants
1

object to paragraphs 3 and 4 of the declaration on the grounds that each

lacks foundation and is irrelevant since there is no showing of how long the Angel Soft
2 3

items were on the shelf and when they were placed there. Since it is Defendants position that they have had a California trademark since 2003 and that they were selling in the Latino market and that it is Plaintiff who is trying to now .jump into that market, the declaration should be disregarded on the grounds that it is overbroad and lacks foundation. The lawsuit was filed in December 2007 and the request for TRO
and in.iunction were filed at the same time and there is no statement from Mr. Halcon

4
5

6
7

8
9

10
11
j: 1l1I "' :J ID o (\I -

that these or similar items were in any of the listed stores at the time Plaintiff tried to displace Angelite with its lawsuit. Dated: March 13.2008 KAZANJIAN & MARTINETTI RONALD MARTINETTI, ESQ. By ~«\v\ V~~ri~ # Ronald Martinet ti Attorneys for Defendants

12

Z Z -"' (J)1-> 11l~<

0\ ~ Z

13 14
15 16

U
17 18 19

20
21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2

Case 3:07-cv-02391-JAH-POR

Document 38

Filed 03/13/2008

Page 3 of 3

1

PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL -(1013a, 2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am employed in the county of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within above-entitled action; my business addressis 520 E. Wilson Ave.. Suite 250. Glendale.California 91206.
On March 13, 2008 I served the foregoing DEFENDANTS OBJECTIONS TO DECLARATION OF GEORGE HALCON FILED IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF GEORGIA PACIFIC'S REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUCTION on all the interested parties in this action as follows:

2 3 4 5

6 7
8 9

10
11

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
the

x

a true

copy

StephenP. Swinton, Esq. Adam A. Welland, Esq. Latham & Watkins LLP 12636 High Bluff Drive, Suite 400 San Diego, CA 92130-2071 Fax No.: (858) 523-5450 an original
DELIVERY NIA MESSENGER;

BY PERSONAL

-XBY ELECTRONIC FILING: I am familiar with the United StatesDistrict Cou!t;, Southern District of California's practice for collecting and processing electronic filings. Under that practice, documents are electronically filed with the court. The court's CM/ECF system will generatea Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) to the filing party, the assignedjudge, and any registeredusersin the case. The NEF will constitute service of the document. Registration as a CM/ECF user constitutes consent to electronic service through the court's transmission facilities. Under said practice the above mentioned parties were served.
-PREP AID POST AGE: I deposited such an envelope in the mail at Glendale, California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. u. S. MAIL: I am "readily familiar" with our finn's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day on the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of any party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing affidavit.

x BY FACSIMILE: On the interested parties in this action pursuant to C.R.C. RULE 2009 (b). The telephone number of the facsimile machine I used was (818) 241-2193. This facsimile machine complies with Rule 2003 (2) of the California Rules of Court. The transmission was reported as complete and without error. The facsimile machine printed out a record indicating that the transmission was successfully completed.
"J:/' Executed on March 13,2008, Glenda1e, California. IdeCJ foregoing is true and correct. C-~~~ erpena d perjury, that

Rosa Muno;;

\

\.