Free Discrepancy Order Accepting Document - District Court of California - California


File Size: 16.7 kB
Pages: 1
Date: March 11, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 313 Words, 1,972 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/260364/20.pdf

Download Discrepancy Order Accepting Document - District Court of California ( 16.7 kB)


Preview Discrepancy Order Accepting Document - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-02405-L-CAB

Document 20

Filed 03/11/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: 07cv2405-L (CAB) CASE TITLE: Really Likeable People, et al. v. Lowlife Corporation, et al. E-FILED DATE: 3/7/08 DOCKET NO.: 18 DOCUMENT TITLE: Joint Motion DOCUMENT FILED BY: Defendants Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: x
Civil Local Rule or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

Discrepancy

X

ECF § 2(h) ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(g) ECF § 2(f) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Civ. L. Rule 15.1

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed (Doc. 8, 9) Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Lacking proper signature - Notice of Lodgment not signed Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/Document(s) are not timely Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing table of contents Amended pleading not complete in itself OTHER:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: X The documents are accepted despite the discrepancies noted above. Any further noncompliant documents may be stricken from the record.

The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties. Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1. DATED: March 10, 2008

M. James Lorenz United States District Court Judge