Free Order - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-02404-BTM-CAB

Document 7

Filed 03/24/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On March 24, 2008, the Court held an Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. The case did not settle. Therefore, the Court discussed compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 26 immediately thereafter. Based thereon, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Any objections made to initial disclosure pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil v. GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, dba DITECH.COM, an entity of unknown form; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. HARU LINDSEY, an individual, Plaintiff, ORDER FOLLOWING EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE, SETTING RULE 26 COMPLIANCE AND NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Civil No. 07cv2404 BTM (CAB) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Procedure, Rule 26(a)(1)(A)-(D) are overruled, and the parties are ordered to proceed with the initial disclosure process. Any further objections to initial disclosure will be resolved as required by Rule 26. 2. 3. April 28, 2008; 4. A discovery plan shall be lodged with Magistrate Judge Bencivengo on or before The Rule 26(f) conference shall be completed on or before April 14, 2008; The date of initial disclosure pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(A-D) shall occur before

April 28, 2008; and, 1

07cv2404

Case 3:07-cv-02404-BTM-CAB

Document 7

Filed 03/24/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 sanctions.

5.

A Case Management Conference, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

16(b) shall be held on May 6, 2008, at 9:30 a.m. The conference shall be telephonic, with attorneys only. Counsel for Plaintiff shall coordinate and initiate the conference call. Failure of any counsel or party to comply with this Order will result in the imposition of

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 24, 2008

CATHY ANN BENCIVENGO United States Magistrate Judge

2

07cv2404