Free Discrepancy Order Rejecting Document - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cr-03478-JLS

Document 4

Filed 01/28/2008

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES CASE NO.: 07-CR-3478-JLS E-FILED DATE: 01/25/2008 DOCUMENT TITLE: CASE TITLE: USA v. Aispuro DOCUMENT NO.: 3

Government's Response and Opposition to Defendant's Motions together with Government's Motion for Reciprocal Discovery (incorrectly docketed by filer as motion to dismiss indictment) Government

DOCUMENT FILED BY:

Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted:
Local Rule or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

Discrepancy

ECF § 2(h) X ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(g) ECF § 2(f) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Crim. L. Rule 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Crim. L. Rule 32.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Crim. L. Rule 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Crim. L. Rule 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Civ. L. Rule 15.1 Civ. L. Rule 30.1

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document filed Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Lacking proper signature Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/Document(s) are not timely Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing table of contents Amended pleading not complete in itself Depositions not accepted absent a court order Supplemental documents require court order

X

OTHER: There are no defense motions on file, therefore any response by Government is premature.

Electronic Document Discrepancy Notice and Order Page 1 of 2

07cr3478

Case 3:07-cr-03478-JLS

Document 4

Filed 01/28/2008

Page 2 of 2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. X The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record and serve a copy of this order on all parties. The Government is granted leave to re-file its motion for reciprocal discovery.

Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1.

DATED: January 28, 2008 Honorable Janis L. Sammartino United States District Judge

Electronic Document Discrepancy Notice and Order Page 2 of 2

07cr3478