Free Motion to Compel - District Court of California - California


File Size: 24.0 kB
Pages: 3
Date: February 4, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 460 Words, 2,896 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/260463/9-1.pdf

Download Motion to Compel - District Court of California ( 24.0 kB)


Preview Motion to Compel - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cr-03479-LAB

Document 9

Filed 02/04/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

STEPHEN D. DEMIK California State Bar No. 221167 FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF SAN DIEGO, INC. 225 Broadway, Suite 900 San Diego, California 92101-5030 Telephone: (619) 234-8467 Attorneys for Mr. Pyles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (HONORABLE JOHN A. HOUSTON) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 07CR3479-LAB DATE: TIME: February 4, 2008 2:00 p.m.

12

Plaintiff,
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

v. MARK ANTHONY PYLES, Defendant.

NOTICE OF MOTIONS AND MOTIONS: TO COMPEL DISCOVERY; AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE FURTHER MOTIONS __________________________________ (1) (2)

TO:

KAREN P. HEWITT, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY: PAUL L. STARITA, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 4, 2008, or as soon thereafter as counsel

may be heard, the defendant, Mark Anthony Pyles, by and through his counsel, Stephen D. Demik and Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., will ask this Court to enter an order granting the following motions. // // // // //

Case 3:07-cr-03479-LAB

Document 9

Filed 02/04/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

MOTIONS The defendant, Tammy White, by and through his attorneys, Stephen D. Demik and Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., pursuant to the United States Constitution, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and all other applicable statutes, case law and local rules, hereby moves this Court for an order: 1) to compel discovery; and 2) for leave to file further motions. These motions are based upon the instant motions and notice of motions, the attached

8

statement of facts and memorandum of points and authorities, and all other materials that
9

may come to this Court's attention at the time of the hearing on these motions.
10 11

Respectfully submitted,
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Dated: February 4, 2008

/s/ Stephen D. Demik STEPHEN D. DEMIK Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc. Attorneys for Mr. Pyles

07CR3479-LAB

Case 3:07-cr-03479-LAB

Document 9

Filed 02/04/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) Plaintiff, )Case No. 07cr2731-JTM ) v. )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ) MARK ANTHONY PYLES, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Counsel for Defendant certifies that the foregoing pleading, is true and accurate to the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

9

best of her information and belief, and that a copy of the foregoing has been electronically
10

served this day upon:
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Paul L Starita [email protected],[email protected]

mailed to:

Mark Anthony Pyles Defendant /s/ Stephen D. Demik STEPHEN D. DEMIK Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc. Attorneys for Mr. Pyles

Dated: February 4, 2008

07CR3479-LAB