Free Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-00037-H-WMC

Document 25-2

Filed 09/19/2008

Page 1 of 1

PROOF OF SERVICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUHTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES RICHARD STIEFEL v. BECHTEL CORPORATION et al. CASE NUMBER O8CV0037 H (WMc) I am employed in the City of San Diego, County of San Diego, State of California. I am over the age of l8 years and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1550 Hotel Circle Avenue North, Suite 170 San Diego, CA 92108. On the below date I served the following documents: JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN PURSUANT TO RULE 26(f) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE On the following person(s): Thomas M. McInerney, Esq. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 One Market Plaza San Francisco, CA 94105 Attorneys for Defendants BECHTEL CORPORATION and BECHTEL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Said documents were served by submitting them to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California's Electronic Case Filing System. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on September 19, 2008 at San Diego, California. __/s/ Marcus Jackson______ Marcus Jackson, Esq.

1