Free Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 25.8 kB
Pages: 5
Date: June 4, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,005 Words, 6,267 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/261064/23.pdf

Download Order - District Court of California ( 25.8 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00046-JM-JMA

Document 23

Filed 06/04/2008

Page 1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On June 4, 2008, the Court conducted a telephonic Case Management Conference. conference. Counsel for the parties appeared for the OUTERBRIDGE ACCESS ASSOCIATION, ) SUING ON BEHALF OF DIANE CROSS; ) ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., etc.; ) et al., ) ) ) Case No. 08-CV-0046-JM (JMA) ORDER FOLLOWING TELEPHONIC CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Adler will conduct a Settlement Conference on

August 4, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. in his chambers, Room 1165, U.S. Courthouse, 940 Front Street, San Diego, California. Pursuant to Rule 16.1(c) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, all named parties, all counsel, and any other person(s) whose authority is required to negotiate and enter into settlement shall appear in person at the conference, shall be prepared to discuss the claims and defenses, and shall be legally

08cv46

Case 3:08-cv-00046-JM-JMA

Document 23

Filed 06/04/2008

Page 2 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case at the Settlement Conference. The individual(s) present at the

Settlement Conference with settlement authority must have the unfettered discretion and authority on behalf of the party to: 1) fully explore all settlement options and to agree during the Settlement Conference to any settlement terms acceptable to the party (G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989)), 2) change the settlement position of a party during the course of the Settlement Conference (Pitman v. Brinker Int'l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003)), and 3) negotiate a settlement without being restricted by any predetermined level of authority (Nick v. Morgan's Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596 (8th Cir. 2001)). Retained outside corporate counsel shall not appear on behalf of a corporation as the party who has the authority to negotiate and enter into a settlement. The failure of any

counsel, party or authorized person to appear at the Settlement Conference as required will result in the immediate imposition of sanctions. All conference discussions will be informal, off the record, privileged, and confidential. Counsel for any non-English speaking parties is responsible for arranging for the appearance of an interpreter at the conference. Based upon the Court's familiarity with cases brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, and in the interest of promoting the just, efficient, and economical determination of this action, the Court issues the following

2

08cv46

Case 3:08-cv-00046-JM-JMA

Document 23

Filed 06/04/2008

Page 3 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

orders: 1. All discovery shall be stayed in this case until after

the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference; 2. Twenty-one (21) days prior to the Settlement Conference

(not later than July 14, 2008), Plaintiff's(s') counsel shall lodge with Magistrate Judge Adler's chambers, and serve on opposing counsel, a statement not in excess of two pages, including the following information: (a) An itemized list of the specific issues on the

subject premises which are the basis of the claimed violations under the Americans with Disabilities Act. A recitation of The

regulations, by number, will not satisfy this requirement. claimed violations must be specifically described. (b)

A statement of the amount and category of damages

claimed by Plaintiff(s) in this action. (c) and (d) The Plaintiff's(s') demand for settlement of the The amount claimed for attorneys' fees and costs;

case in its entirety. 3. Fourteen (14) days prior to the Settlement Conference

(not later than July 21, 2008), counsel for the parties shall meet and confer regarding settlement of: (a) (b) 4. The premises violations alleged; and Damages, costs, and attorneys' fees claims.

Seven (7) days prior to the Settlement Conference (not

later than July 28, 2008), counsel shall lodge with Magistrate Judge Adler's chambers a joint statement advising the Court of the status of settlement negotiations and setting forth all

3

08cv46

Case 3:08-cv-00046-JM-JMA

Document 23

Filed 06/04/2008

Page 4 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

issues in dispute, including property issues, Plaintiff's(s') alleged damages, and the claim for attorneys' fees and costs, along with a description of any settlement demands and/or offers exchanged. 5. The statements required to be lodged with the

undersigned's chambers may be delivered directly to chambers, emailed to [email protected], or faxed to (619) 7029939. 6. Plaintiff's(s') counsel shall be prepared to present to

the Court for in camera review at the Settlement Conference documentation supporting the amount of attorneys' fees and costs claimed. Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall apply to this case. In the event the case does not settle at the

Settlement Conference, the parties shall also be prepared to discuss the following matters at the conclusion of the conference: 1. Any anticipated objections under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 26(a)(1) to the initial disclosure provisions of Rule 26(a)(1)(A-E); 2. 3. The scheduling of the Rule 26(f) conference; The date of initial disclosures and the date for

lodging the discovery plan following the Rule 26(f) conference; and 4. The scheduling of a Case Management Conference pursuant

to Rule 16(b). Plaintiff's(s') counsel shall give notice of the Settlement Conference to parties responding to the complaint after June 1,

4

08cv46

Case 3:08-cv-00046-JM-JMA

Document 23

Filed 06/04/2008

Page 5 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

2008. Questions regarding this case may be directed to the Magistrate Judge's law clerk at (619) 557-5585. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 4, 2008 Jan M. Adler U.S. Magistrate Judge

5

08cv46