Free Discrepancy Order Rejecting Document - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cr-00091-L

Document 17

Filed 05/27/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: 08-CR-0091-L CASE TITLE: USA v. Navarro-Lomeli E-FILED DATE: 5/23/08 DOCKET NO.: 15, 16 DOCUMENT TITLE: In Limine Motion to Exclude DOCUMENT FILED BY: Navarro-Lomeli Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: x
Criminal Local Rule or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

Discrepancy

ECF § 2(h) ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(g) ECF § 2(f) CrimLR 5.1 CrimLR 7.1 or 47.1 CrimLR 7.1 or 47.1 CrimLR 7.1 or 47.1 CrimLR 7.1 CrimLR 15.1 X CrimLR 32.1(a)(6-7)

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Lacking proper signature Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/Document(s) are not timely Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing table of contents Amended pleading not complete in itself OTHER: Documents filed for wrong Defendant

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties. Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1. DATED: May 27, 2008 X

M. James Lorenz United States District Court Judge