Free Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-00060-BTM-CAB

Document 37-9

Filed 04/23/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MELODY A. KRAMER, SBN 169984 KRAMER LAW OFFICE, INC. 9930 Mesa Rim Road, Suite 1600 San Diego, California 92121 Telephone (858) 362-3150 [email protected] J. MICHAEL KALER, SBN 158296 KALER LAW OFFICES 9930 Mesa Rim Road, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92121 Telephone (858) 362-3151 [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff JENS ERIK SORENSEN, as Trustee of SORENSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT TRUST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERNT DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JENS ERIK SORENSEN, as Trustee of SORENSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT TRUST,

) ) ) ) Plaintiff ) v. ) ) EMERSON ELECTRIC CO., a Missouri ) corporation; ONE WOLRD ) TECHNOLOGIES INC., a Delaware ) corporation; RIDGE TOOL COMPANY, an ) Ohio corporation; RIDGID INC., a Delaware ) corporation; and DOES 1 ­ 100 ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ ) and related counterclaims. ) ) ) )

Case No. 3:08-cv-060-BTM-CAB PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENTS ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPLICATION OF 35 U.S.C. § 295 PRESUMPTION OF INFRINGEMENT Date: June 20, 2008 Time: 11:00 A.M. Courtroom 15, 5 th Floor Judge: Hon. Barry Ted Moskowitz NO ORAL ARGUMENT UNLESS REQUESTED BY THE COURT Oral Argument is Respectfully Requested at Hearing on This Matter

Case 3:08-cv-00060-BTM-CAB

Document 37-9

Filed 04/23/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PLAINTIFF Jens Erik Sorensen, as Trustee of Sorensen Research & Development Trust, hereby requests that the Court hear oral arguments on Plaintiff's Motion for Application of 35 U.S.C. § 295 Presumption of Infringement for the following reasons: 1. 2. for years. 3. 4. Essential evidence on the issue of infringement is in the hands of third The parties should neither proceed with this case, nor go into a stay of parties that are outside the jurisdiction of U.S. courts. discovery, without knowing which party will bear the burden of proof as to infringement or non-infringement of the subject patent. 5. in this case. These matters will more easily be explained to the Court with oral arguments. DATED this Wednesday, April 23, 2008. JENS ERIK SORENSEN, as Trustee of SORENSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT TRUST, Plaintiff /s/ Melody A. Kramer Melody A. Kramer, Esq. J. Michael Kaler Attorney for Plaintiff This issue is of critical importance to the nature of further proceedings The issue of application of the 35 U.S.C. § 295 presumption is not Defendants have requested a stay pending reexamination that could last well-settled with existing caselaw.

2.

Case No. 3:08-cv-00060-BTM-CAB