Free Motion to Dismiss - District Court of California - California


File Size: 41.5 kB
Pages: 3
Date: July 18, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 474 Words, 2,921 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/261348/6-5.pdf

Download Motion to Dismiss - District Court of California ( 41.5 kB)


Preview Motion to Dismiss - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00080-DMS-POR

Document 6-5

Filed 07/18/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of the State of California 2 DAVID S. CHANEY Chief Assistant Attorney General 3 ROCHELLE C. EAST Acting Senior Assistant Attorney General 4 MICHELLE DES JARDINS Supervising Deputy Attorney General 5 PHILLIP LINDSAY, State Bar No. 204444 Deputy Attorney General 110 West A Street, Suite 1100 6 San Diego, CA 92101 P.O. Box 85266 7 San Diego, CA 92186-5266 Telephone: (619) 645-3134 8 Fax: (619) 645-2581 Email: [email protected] 9 10 Attorneys for Defendant R. Darr 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 TO MATTHEW L. JOHNSON, Plaintiff in pro per: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant Darr has moved to dismiss one or more of DARR, . v. MATTHEW L. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, 08-CV-0080-DMS (POR) WYATT NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Hearing: Time: Courtroom: Judge: August 28, 2008 2:00 p.m. H The Honorable Louisa S. Porter IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

23 Plaintiff's claims based on Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit 24 as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. ยง 1997e. A defendant may move to 25 dismiss a claim for lack of exhaustion of nonjudicial remedies through an unenumerated Rule 26 12(b) motion. Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1119 (9th Cir. 2003). 27 /// 28 ///
Wyatt Notice Case No. 08-CV-0080-DMS (POR)

1

Case 3:08-cv-00080-DMS-POR

Document 6-5

Filed 07/18/2008

Page 2 of 3

1

"In deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust nonjudicial remedies, the court

2 may look beyond the pleadings and decide disputed issues of fact." Id. at 1119-1120. The 3 parties may tender admissible evidence to create an evidentiary record sufficient for the court to 4 determine if the plaintiff properly exhausted his or her administrative remedies before filing suit. 5 See id. at 1120 n.14. You have the right to file counter-affidavits or other responsive evidentiary 6 materials in opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of exhaustion of administrative 7 remedies. If you fail to produce such counter-evidence, Defendant's evidence might be taken as 8 the truth, and the Court may grant Defendant's motion. If the Court grants the motion to 9 dismiss, some or all of your claims in this litigation may be dismissed. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
70130459.wpd

Dated: July 17, 2008 Respectfully submitted, EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of the State of California DAVID S. CHANEY Chief Assistant Attorney General ROCHELLE C. EAST Acting Senior Assistant Attorney General MICHELLE DES JARDINS Supervising Deputy Attorney General

/s/Phillip Lindsay PHILLIP LINDSAY Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendant

23 24 25 26 27 28

SD2008700481

Wyatt Notice

Case No. 08-CV-0080-DMS (POR)

2

Case 3:08-cv-00080-DMS-POR

Document 6-5

Filed 07/18/2008

Page 3 of 3