Free Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Personal Jurisdiction - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 41.6 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 325 Words, 2,077 Characters
Page Size: 622 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8620/149-2.pdf

Download Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Personal Jurisdiction - District Court of Delaware ( 41.6 kB)


Preview Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Personal Jurisdiction - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv—O1268-***-MPT Document 149-2 Filed O4/10/2006 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
In re: ) Chapter I I
I
THE IT GROUP, INC., et at. ) Case N0. O2-IO} IS (MFW)
Debtars, ) fointly Administered
)
)
IT LITIGATION TRUST, )
Plaintiff, ) Civ. A. No. O4-CV—I.268 (l<,AJ)
)
v~ >
)
DANIEL A. DUANIELLO, FRANCIS J. )
HARVEY, JAMES C. Mc:GILL, )
RICHARD W. POGUE, PHILLIP B. )
DOLAN, E. MARTIN GIBSON, ROBERT )
F. PUGLIESE, CHARLES W. SCHMIDT, )
JAMES DAVID WATKTNS, ANTHONY )
J. DeLUCA, HARRY J. SOOSE, THE )
CARLYLE GROUP, THE CARLYLE )
GROUP, L.L.C., CARLYLE PARTNERS ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
II, L.P-, CARLYLE SBC PARTNERS, II, )
L.P., CARLYLE INTERNATIONAL )
PARTNERS II, L.P., CARLYLE )
INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS III, C/S )
INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS, )
CARLYLE INVESTMENT GROUP, L.P., )
CARLYT.,E»IT INTERNATIONAL )
PARTNERS, L.P., CARLYLE-IT )
INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS I], L.P., )
CARLYLE-IT PARTNERS LP., and T.C. )
GROUP, LLC., )
Defendants. I
ORDER OF COURT
The Renewed Motion Of Defendants Carlyle International Partners II, L.P.,
Carlyle International Partners III, LP., C/S Internationai Partners, Carlyle~I'I` International
Partners, LP., Carlyle-IT International Partners II, L.P., And Richard W. Pogue To Dismiss
For Lack Of Persona} Jurisdiction (the "Motion") having been tiled, and ai! parties having

Case 1 :04-cv—O1268-***-MPT Document 149-2 Filed O4/10/2006 Page 2 of 2
had an opportunity to be heard, and the Court having given due consideration to the parties’
arguments,
IT IS hereby ORDERED, ADIUDGED, and DECREED that the Motion is
GRANTED;
IT IS further ORDERED that Counts I·V and IX of the above-referenced
matter are hereby dismissed as to defendants Carlyte International Partners II, L.P., Carlyle
International Partners III, LP., C/S International Partners, Carlyle-IT International Partners,
LP., Carlyle—IT International Partners II, LP., and Richard W, Pogue for lack of personat
jurisdictionr
Dated: , 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
cc: All counsel ofreeord
2