Free Verdict Sheet - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv—O1275-KAJ Document 117 Filed O3/14/2006 Page 1 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OI? DELAWARE
DONKS IIYDRAULICS, INC., :
: CA. N0.: 04-1275 KA.]
Plaintiff, :
v. :
COLONY INSURANCE COMPANY, : _
TRUCK TIECH INDUSTRIES, INC., :
and TIPCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., :
Defendants.
PLAINTII<`F’S VERIJICT FORM I
l. Do you find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the hoses leaked?
YES (continue) NO (call bailiff)
2. Do you find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the leaking hoses caused the failure
of the hydraulic power unit manufactured by Don’s for Fieldale Farms?
YES (continue) N O (call bailiff)
3. Do you find, by a preponderance of the evidence, a breach of the implied warranty of
merchantability in the assembly or sale of the hoses?
YES NO
4. If you answered YES to question 3 above, do you find, by a preponderance of the
evidence, that the breach of the implied warranty of merchantability was the proximate
cause of the leaks in the hoses?
YES NO
5. if you answered YES to question 4 above, do you find, by a preponderance of the
evidence, that the leaking hoses proximately caused the failure of the hydraulic power
unit at Fieldale Farms?
YES NO
Tl

r Case 1 :04-cv—O1275-KAJ Document 117 Filed O3/14/2006 Page 2 of 4
6. Do you find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the failure of the hydraulic power
unit caused a loss of production and extra labor costs at Fieldale Farrns?
YES NO
7. Do you find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Tipco Technologies, Inc., breached
an implied warranty of merchantability which it owed to Don’s?
YES NO
8. Do you find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Truck Tech Industries, Inc., __
breached an implied warranty of merchantability which it owed to Don’s‘?
YES NO
9. Do you find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the leaking hoses were caused by
the negligence of Tipco Technologies, Inc.?
YES NO
1.0. Do you find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the leaking hoses were caused hy
the negligence of Truck Tech Industries, Inc.?
YES NO
ll. If you answered YES to questions 9 and IO above, list the percentage of fault you assign
to each Defendant for the leaking hoses.
% Tipco Technologies, Inc.
% Truck Tech industries, Inc.
I2. Do you find, by a preponderance ofthe evidence, that Doris suffered damages as a result
of the leaking hoses? -
YES NO
13. If you answered YES to question 12 above, please enter the dollar amount that Don’s
proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, it suffered as a result of the leaking hoses?
iii I Loss of Production
2

Case 1 :04-cv—O1275-KAJ Document 117 Filed O3/14/2006 Page 3 of 4
3% Pumps
$ Lodging, meals, and travel expenses l
3% Replacement hoses
$3 Filters
14. Do you find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Colony Insurance Company is
liable to Don’s for damages Dorfs incurred as a result of the loss of production at
Fieldale Farms?
______ YES www NO
1.5. Do you find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Truck Tech breached its contract
with Don’s to supply hoses that did not leak'?
______ YES _______ NO
16. Do you find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Truck Tech’s breach of contract
proximately caused the loss to Doris?
_______ YES __ NO
17. It you answered YES to question 16 above, please enter the dollar amount that Don’s
proved, by a preponderance ofthe evidence, it suffered as a result of the leaking hoses?
35 Loss of Production
35 Pumps
55 Lodging, meals, and travel expenses
tl; Replacement hoses
it? Fitters
3

Case 1:04-cv-01275-KAJ Document 117 Filed O3/14/2006 Page 4 of 4
Dated: , 2006.
(Forcpcrson)
4