Free Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-00385-DMS-NLS

Document 18-2

Filed 08/15/2008

Page 1 of 1

PROPOSED DATES (According to Patent Local Rules) Decision favorable to Defendant (counterclaim added) Plaintiff's Amended Complaint1 Plaintiff's PICs (Patent Local Rule ("PLR") 3.1 and 3.2) ("988 and `814 patents) Defendant PICs (PLR 3.3 and 3.4) (`988 and `814 patents) Preliminary Claim Construction (PLR 4.1.a) (`988 and `814 patents) Responsive Claim Construction (PLR 4.1.c) (`988 and'844 patents) Plaintiff's PICs (PLR 3.1 and 3.2) (`373 patent) Defendants' PICs (PLR 3.3 and 3.4) (`373 patent) Preliminary Claim Construction (PLR 4.1.a) (`373 patent) Responsive Claim Construction (PLR 4.1.c) (`373 patent) Joint Claim Construction Chart (PLR 4.2) (all patents) Completion of all Markman Discovery Including Expert Discovery (PLR 4.3) (all patents) Claim Construction Briefs (PLR 4.4a) (all patents) Responsive Claim Construction Briefs (PLR 4.4.b) (all patents) Claim Construction Hearing (PLR 4.5) (all patents)
1 2
FSFA/1051305/5885411v.1

August 5, 2008

`373 Patent in Suit October 1, 2008

`373 Patent NOT in Suit October 1, 2008

November 1, 2008 August 11, 2008

N/A August 11, 2008

October 13, 2008

October 13, 2008

October 27, 2008

October 27, 2008

November 10, 2008 November 17, 20082 December 17, 2008 January 5, 2009

November 10, 2008

N/A N/A N/A

January 19, 2009

N/A

February 16, 2009

November 28, 2008

March 16, 2009

December 23, 2008

March 30, 2009 April 13, 2009

January 19, 2009 February 2, 2009

May 15, 2009

March 2, 2009

See attached Stipulation Fourteen (14) days after Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is filed.

Exhibit 1 to Joint Rule 26f Report