Free Proposed Pretrial Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 347.0 kB
Pages: 108
Date: May 1, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 11,050 Words, 65,558 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8634/127.pdf

Download Proposed Pretrial Order - District Court of Delaware ( 347.0 kB)


Preview Proposed Pretrial Order - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 1 of 108

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE __________________________________________ ) AES PUERTO RICO, L.P., ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Civ. No. 04-1282-JJF ) ALSTOM POWER, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________)

PROPOSED PRETRIAL ORDER

John S. Spadaro (# 3155) MURPHY SPADARO & LANDON 1011 Centre Road, Suite 210 Wilmington, DE 19805 Tel (302) 472-8100 Fax (302) 472-8135 Dane H. Butswinkas R. Hackney Wiegmann Daniel D. Williams Ann N. Sagerson James L. Tuxbury WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP 725 Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Tel. (202) 434-5000 Fax (202) 434-5029 Attorneys for AES Puerto Rico, L.P.

Richard R. Wier, Jr. (#716) Daniel W. Scialpi (#4146) RICHARD R. WIER, JR., P.A. Two Mill Road, Suite 200 Wilmington, DE 19806 Tel (302) 888-3222 John Anthony Wolf James E. Edwards, Jr. Anthony F. Vittoria Michael A. Schollaert OBER, KALER, GRIMES & SHRIVER A Professional Corporation 120 East Baltimore Street Baltimore, MD 21202-1643 Tel: (410) 685-1120 Fax: (410) 547-0699 Attorneys for ALSTOM Power Inc.

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 2 of 108

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.

NATURE OF THE ACTION ................................................................................................1 A. B. AES-PR's Statement..................................................................................................1 ALSTOM's Statement ...............................................................................................1

II. III. IV.

BASIS FOR JURISDICTION ...............................................................................................2 ADMITTED FACTS REQUIRING NO PROOF..................................................................2 ISSUES OF FACT REMAINING TO BE LITIGATED ......................................................4 A. B. AES-PR's List of Issues of Fact To Be Litigated ......................................................4 ALSTOM's List of Issues of Fact To Be Litigated ...................................................6

V.

ISSUES OF LAW REMAINING TO BE LITIGATED........................................................10 A. B. AES-PR's List of Issues of Law To Be Litigated......................................................10 ALSTOM's List of Issues of Law To Be Litigated ...................................................12

VI.

LIST OF EXHIBITS..............................................................................................................19 A. B. AES-PR's List of Exhibits .........................................................................................19 ALSTOM's List of Exhibits ......................................................................................34

VII.

LIST OF WITNESSES ..........................................................................................................61 A. B. AES-PR's List of Witnesses ......................................................................................61 ALSTOM's List of Witnesses ...................................................................................64

VIII. IX. X.

AES-PR'S BRIEF STATEMENT OF PROOF .....................................................................66 ALSTOM'S BRIEF STATEMENT OF PROOF ..................................................................73 SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS .......................................................................................102

i

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 3 of 108

XI.

OTHER MATTERS THAT THE PARTIES DEEM APPROPRIATE.................................102 A. B. AES-PR's List of Other Matters ................................................................................102 ALSTOM's List of Other Matters .............................................................................102

XII.

CONCLUSION......................................................................................................................105

ii

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 4 of 108

Pursuant to D. Del Rule 16.4, Plaintiff AES Puerto Rico, L.P. ("AES-PR") and Defendant ALSTOM Power Inc. ("ALSTOM") submit this proposed pretrial order. I. NATURE OF THE ACTION A. AES-PR's Statement This is a breach of warranty case concerning equipment that Defendant ALSTOM contracted to design, supply and commission during construction of Plaintiff AES Puerto Rico's 454 megawatt coal-fired power plant in Guayama, Puerto Rico. The equipment at issue includes pollution control equipment and boiler tube stabilization components. ALSTOM expressly warranted that this equipment would comply with the parties' contract and be free from material defects. AES Puerto Rico contends that ALSTOM breached the Contract because the equipment was defective and ALSTOM failed to fulfill its duty under the Contract to correct the defects and to cause the equipment to comply with the Contract. ALSTOM has denied AES Puerto Rico's claims and contends that any damage to the equipment was caused by AES Puerto Rico's misuse of the equipment. B. ALSTOM's Statement On September 20, 2004, AES Puerto Rico, L.P. ("AES-PR") filed a single-count Complaint against ALSTOM Power Inc. ("ALSTOM"), asserting two claims for breach of express warranty: (i) the first sought recovery of damages allegedly attributable to accelerated corrosion of air pollution control equipment supplied by ALSTOM; and (ii) the second sought recovery of damages allegedly related to the purchase and installation of additional boiler tube stabilization components. ALSTOM answered the Complaint, denying liability with respect to AES-PR's two claims in their entirety. There is no counterclaim. Neither the Complaint nor the Answer have been Amended.

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 5 of 108

II. BASIS FOR JURISDICTION Federal jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2). AES-PR is a limited partnership the partners of which are citizens of foreign states. ALSTOM is a citizen of Delaware and Connecticut. The amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. III. ADMITTED FACTS REQUIRING NO PROOF 1. 2. Plaintiff AES-PR is a limited partnership formed pursuant to the laws of Delaware. AES-PR is the owner of a 454-megawatt co-generation coal-fired power plant in

Guayama, Puerto Rico. 3. Defendant ALSTOM is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware

with its principal place of business in the State of Connecticut. 4. Inc. 5. AES-PR entered into a contract with Duke/Fluor Daniel Caribbean S.E. ("D/FD") for the ALSTOM is the successor to a company formerly known as Combustion Engineering,

engineering, design and construction of the power plant in April, 1996. 6. ALSTOM, through its predecessor company, Combustion Engineering, Inc., entered into

a contract with D/FD, dated February 24, 1998 (the "Contract") whereby ALSTOM, among other things, was to furnish, erect, and provide start-up assistance with respect to Circulating Fluidized Bed Boilers and related equipment, including air-pollution control equipment. Exhibit No. D-004 is a genuine and admissible copy of ALSTOM's Contract with D/FD. 7. The original Contract Price under the Contract between D/FD and ALSTOM referenced

in Item No. 6 above was $119 million.

2

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 6 of 108

8.

The air pollution control equipment includes, among other things, two circulating dry

scrubbers ("CDS") and two electrostatic precipitators ("ESP"). 9. ALSTOM entered into a Purchase Order with Environmental Elements Corporation

("EEC") (the "EEC Purchase Order"), dated March 30, 1999, pursuant to which EEC agreed to supply to ALSTOM the pollution control equipment for the Plant. Pursuant to Change Order No. 1 to the EEC Purchase Order, the contract price was $14,527,570. 10. 11. The EEC Purchase Order contained a corrosion warranty at Paragraph 5, page 6. On February 10 - 11, 2000, during the pre-construction phase of the Project,

representatives of AES-PR, D/FD, ALSTOM, and EEC attended a meeting in Windsor, Connecticut (the "2000 Windsor meeting"). 12. 13. AES-PR began commercial operation of the plant on November 28, 2002. In November, 2003, AES-PR, during a shutdown of the plant's Unit 2, discovered that

certain internal components of the ESP on Unit 2 had corroded and AES-PR provided notice to ALSTOM of the corrosion. 14. In January, 2004, AES-PR, during a shutdown of the plant's Unit 1, discovered that

certain internal components of the ESP on Unit 1 had corroded and AES-PR provided notice to ALSTOM of the corrosion.

3

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 7 of 108

IV. ISSUES OF FACT REMAINING TO BE LITIGATED A. 1. AES-PR's List of Issues of Fact To Be Litigated. Whether Part III, Section 1.0 of the Contract between D/FD and ALSTOM (the

Contract") included various express warranties (collectively, the "Warranty"). 2. Whether, on or about October 31, 2003, D/FD assigned its rights under the Warranty to

AES-PR. 3. Whether the Contract included an express warranty against the consequences of

accelerated corrosion of the CDS and ESP equipment (the "Corrosion Warranty"). 4. Whether the Contract included an express warranty related to the "Boiler Hot Loop" (the

"Boiler Hot Loop" Warranty). 5. 6. Whether the corrosion discovered in the ESPs of Units 1 and 2 is accelerated corrosion. Whether the corrosion affected the structural integrity of the Equipment (or any portion

thereof) or the ability of the Equipment mechanically to perform. 7. Whether the August 2001 Operation and Maintenance ("O&M") Manual was modified

by written and oral instructions provided by ALSTOM and/or EEC during the start-up and commissioning phase of the project. 8. Whether the EEC August 2001 O&M manual is one of the "Contractors Operations and

Maintenance manuals" referred to in Section 1.6 of the Contract. 9. Whether ALSTOM determined during commissioning and start-up of the project that the

air pollution control equipment or any portion thereof was defective. 10. Whether ALSTOM and/or EEC operated the plant prior to performance acceptance in

accordance with the EEC August 2001 O&M manual.

4

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 8 of 108

11.

Whether ALSTOM and/or EEC knew in 2002 that operating the CDS with a CDS outlet

temperature between 150 and 155 degrees Fahrenheit created an increased risk of corrosion in the ESP. 12. Whether ALSTOM modified the operating instructions of the air pollution control

equipment during commissioning and start-up to permit the equipment to comply with certain air permits, but in a manner that created a risk of accelerated corrosion. 13. Whether ALSTOM and/or EEC instructed AES-PR to operate the CDS at the higher of

30 degree approach to adiabatic saturation or 152 F during normal operations. 14. Whether AES-PR generally operated the CDS with an outlet temperature at 30 degrees

above approach to adiabatic saturation. 15. Whether AES-PR reasonably relied on ALSTOM's and/or EEC's modified operating and

maintenance procedures. 16. Whether AES-PR appropriately operated and maintained the fluidized bed heat

exchanger and air pollution control equipment. 17. Whether the operating temperature of the CDS affects the ability of the ESP to control

opacity. 18. Whether the tube failures experienced on September 16, 2003, January 9, 2004 and June

3, 2004 were the result of a design defect in the FHBE handcuff configuration. 19. Whether, in January 2004, AES-PR gave ALSTOM notice of its warranty claim for

ALSTOM's design deficiency in the internal clamp configuration of the fluidized bed heat exchanger tube bundles, commonly referred to as the FBHE "handcuffs." 20. Whether the additional handcuffs installed by AES-PR are an "enhancement" not

necessary for the proper functioning of the fluidized bed heat exchangers.

5

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 9 of 108

21.

Whether ALSTOM declined to repair the equipment and render the equipment as

warranted. 22. 23. Whether the scope of ALSTOM's Warranty covers AES-PR's claims. Whether it is standard in the industry to follow the direction of an equipment

manufacturer's field personnel during commissioning. 24. 25. 26. 27. Whether AES-PR can recover damages associated with the stabilization program. Whether AES-PR can recover damages associated with the replacement collector plates. Whether AES-PR can recover damages for modifications to the water treatment system. Whether AES-PR can recover damages for installation of a second set of FBHE

handcuffs. 28. Whether AES-PR is entitled to the amount of damages it claims.

B. 1.

ALSTOM's List of Issues of Fact To Be Litigated. Has AES satisfied its burden of proving that, prior to November 28, 2004, there was

accelerated corrosion of the CDS collector plates that materially affected or is reasonably expected to affect materially by November 28, 2006 (i) the structural integrity of the ESP or any portion thereof or (ii) the ability of the ESP to mechanically perform? 2. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that it satisfied all conditions precedent to its

claim, including operating and maintaining the pollution control equipment in accordance with the O&M Manuals prepared by EEC and submitted by ALSTOM to D/FD, in accordance with specified operating parameters, and in accordance with typical systems operation at baseload and specified capacity factors?

6

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 10 of 108

3.

Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that it satisfied the contractual conditions

precedent to ALSTOM's warranty obligations under the accelerated corrosion warranty in Section 1.6 of the General Terms and Conditions of ALSTOM's Contract with D/FD? 4. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that it monitored and controlled properly the

chloride content of the CDS spray water as required in the O&M Manuals? 5. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that it maintained records regarding the

chloride content of the CDS spray water as required in the O&M Manuals? 6. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that it monitored and controlled the chloride

content of the ash in the CDS as required in the O&M Manuals? 7. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that it maintained records regarding the

chloride content of the ash in the CDS as required in the O&M Manuals? 8. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that it properly adjusted the CDS outlet

temperature based upon the chloride content of the CDS spray water or the ash in the CDS as required in the O&M Manuals? 9. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that it maintained records establishing that it

adjusted the CDS outlet temperature based upon the chloride content of the CDS spray water and the ash in the CDS as required in the O&M Manuals? 10. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that it performed maintenance of the CDS

spray nozzles and that it properly maintained records establishing that it performed maintenance of the CDS spray nozzles as required in the O&M Manuals? 11. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that it increased the CDS outlet temperature

during the operation of soot blowers in the CFB Boilers as required in the O&M Manuals?

7

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 11 of 108

12.

Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that it maintained records indicating that it

increased the CDS outlet temperature during the operation of the soot blowers in the CFB Boilers as required in the O&M Manuals? 13. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that it recorded and maintained other

maintenance and operating data that was required to be maintained pursuant to the O&M Manuals? 14. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that it is excused from its non-performance

of conditions precedent to its claim under the accelerated corrosion warranty based upon ALSTOM's conduct under the doctrines of estoppel and waiver? 15. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that the O&M Manuals were amended in

accordance with the terms of the Contract? 16. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that it monitored corrosion based upon a

mapping program mutually agreed to with ALSTOM? 17. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that, in good faith, it attempted to reach an

agreement with ALSTOM as to the extent of corrosion or the appropriate remedy? 18. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that it used best faith efforts to mutually

agree upon with ALSTOM appropriate remedial actions with respect to the corrosion of the ESP collector plates? 19. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that, in the absence of a mutual agreement

with ALSTOM as to the extent of corrosion or the appropriate remedy, that it referred, or attempted to refer, the dispute to a mutually agreeable third-party mediator?

8

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 12 of 108

20.

Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that the corrosion of the CDS collector plates

was not caused, in whole or in part, by deviations in the fuel or feedstock from the limits specified in the Contract between ALSTOM and D/FD? 21. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that it gave ALSTOM reasonable access to

test and operating records, the equipment, and other information ALSTOM deemed necessary to satisfy itself of the validity of AES-PR's claim under the accelerated corrosion warranty? 22. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that the damages sought in this action

constitute appropriate remedial actions that are required in order to address the consequences of accelerated corrosion outside of the industry standards for power-generated facilities with dry scrubbing systems such that the corrosion will not materially affect or is not reasonably expected to materially affect the structural integrity of the ESP's or any portion thereof or the ability of the ESP to mechanically perform during the period ending November 28, 2006? 23. Is AES-PR barred from recovering the cost of improvements to the Plant, including the

cost of injecting wastewater into the CFB Boilers, the cost of operating the Reverse Osmosis system, and for the cost of procuring, installing, and operating a brine concentrator and crystallizer unit beyond the four-year period of ALSTOM's accelerated corrosion warranty? 24. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that ALSTOM's alleged breaches of

warranty were a substantial factor in causing any of AES-PR's claimed damages? 25. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving the measure of its damages, and each

component thereof, to a reasonable certainty? 26. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that the FBHE handcuffs installed by

ALSTOM do not comply with the provisions of ALSTOM's Contract with D/FD or that they are not free from defects in materials and workmanship and in full compliance with any design or

9

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 13 of 108

engineering furnished by ALSTOM, or that they were not, at the time of installation, new and fit for their specified purpose as set forth in ALSTOM's Contract with D/FD and in full compliance with the requirements of that Contract? 27. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that it furnished prompt written notice to

ALSTOM, or that D/FD did so on its behalf, regarding claimed defects in the FBHE handcuffs? 28. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that the installation of a second set of

handcuffs in all six FBHEs was required in order to cause ALSTOM's Work to comply with warranties given by ALSTOM with regard to those materials? 29. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving that ALSTOM breached warranties with

regard to the installation of "handcuffs" on the tubes of the Fluidized Bed Heat Exchangers? 30. Has AES-PR satisfied its burden of proving the measure of its damages for alleged

breach of warranty with regard to the FBHE handcuffs to a reasonable certainty?

V. ISSUES OF LAW REMAINING TO BE LITIGATED A. 1. AES-PR's List of Issues of Law To Be Litigated. Whether, absent AES-PR's consent, ALSTOM is permitted to assign its obligations

under the Contract to Environmental Elements Corporation ("EEC") and blame EEC for the failure of the pollution control equipment to perform as promised. Authority: Klauder & Nunno Enters., Inc. v. Hereford Assoc., Inc., 723 F. Supp. 336, 346 (E.D. Pa. 1989). 2. Whether ALSTOM is equitably estopped from claiming that the warranty is void on the

basis of alleged operator error.

10

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 14 of 108

Authority: Bechtel v. Robinson, 886 F.2d 644, 650 (3d Cir. 1989); Wilson v. Am. Ins. Co., 209 A.2d 902, 903-04 (Del. 1965); Wolf v. Globe Liquor Co., 103 A.2d 774, 776 (Del. 1954). 3. Whether ALSTOM has waived any claim that the warranty is void on the basis of alleged

operator error. Authority: Aeroglobal Capital Mgmt. v. Cirrus Indus., Inc., 871 A.2d 428, 443 (Del. 2005); Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. Pepsico, 297 A.2d 28, 33 (Del. 1972). 4. Whether the Contract contains any conditions precedent. Authority: Green County v. Quinlan, 211 U.S. 582, 594 (1909); Castle v. Cohen, 840 F.2d 173, 176 (3d Cir. 1988); James E. Brady & Co. v. Eno, 992 F.2d 864, 869 (8th Cir. 1993); Hurt v. New York Life Ins. Co., 53 F.2d 453, 454 (10th Cir. 1931); Gilbert v. El Paso Co., 575 A.2d 1131, 1142 (Del. 1990); Weiss v. Nw. Broad., Inc., 140 F. Supp. 2d 336, 343 (D. Del. 2001); I.R.V. Merchandising Corp. v. Jay Ward Productions, Inc., 856 F. Supp. 168, 174 (S.D.N.Y. 1994); Bristol Sav. Bank v. Silver, 208 B.R. 100, 105 (D. Conn. 1996); Gilbert v. El Paso Co., 575 A.2d 1131, 1142 (Del. 1990); Haft v. Haft, 671 A.2d 413, 417 (Del. Ch. 1995); Stolz Realty Co. v. Paul, 1995 WL 654152, at *9 (Del. Super. Sept. 20, 1995); 17A Am. Jur. 2d Contracts § 460 5. Whether ALSTOM is required to render the equipment capable of operating as warranted

and guaranteed or whether ALSTOM need only make temporary repairs to last through the warranty claim period. Authority: Burke County Pub. Schs. Bd. of Educ. v. Juno Constr. Corp., 306 S.E.2d 557, 560 (N.C. Ct. App. 1983); Pig Imp. Co. v. Middle States Holding Co., 943 F. Supp. 392, 400 (D. Del. 1996); Pennington v. Rhodes, 929 S.W.2d 169, 173 (Ark. Ct. App. 1996).

11

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 15 of 108

6.

Whether any of the damages AES-PR claims are consequential damages, and whether

that question is one of law or fact. Authority: Chatlos Sys., Inc. v. Nat'l Cash Register Corp., 670 F.2d 1304, 1305-07 (3d Cir. 1982); United States ex. rel. Roby v. Boeing Co., 79 F. Supp. 2d 877, 895 (S.D. Ohio 1999); Long Island Lighting Co. v. Transamerica Delaval, Inc., 646 F. Supp. 1442, 1459 & n.30 (S.D.N.Y. 1986); Roneker v. Kenworth Truck Co., 944 F. Supp. 179, 186 (W.D.N.Y. 1996); Wood River Pipeline Co. v. Wilbros Energy & Services Co., 738 P.2d 866 (Kan. 1987); Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, § 2-715(2). 7. Whether AES-PR's damages are to be limited as disproportionate. Authority: Perini Corp. v. Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc., 610 A.2d 364, 381 (N.J. 1992); Long Island Lighting Co. v. IMO Industries, Inc, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5351 (S.D.N.Y. May 9, 1990); Restatement (Second) Contracts § 351.

B. 1.

ALSTOM's List of Issues of Law To Be Litigated. Based on Section 52 of the General Terms and Conditions of ALSTOM's Contract with

D/FD, is the accelerated corrosion warranty in Section 1.6 of the General Terms and Conditions of ALSTOM's Contract the exclusive remedy for AES-PR's claim for corrosion of the ESP collector plates? Authority: True North Comm. Inc. v. Publicis, S.A., 711 A.2d 34 (Del. Ch. 1997) 2. Based on Section 52 of the General Terms and Conditions of ALSTOM's Contract with

D/FD, is AES-PR barred from recovering incidental, special, or consequential damages of any kind in this action? Authority: Wood River Pipeline Co. v. Wilbros Eng'r Serv. Co., 738 P.2d 866 (Kan.

12

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 16 of 108

1987); CitiSteel U.S.A., Inc. v. Gen. Elec. Co., No. Civ. A. 99-810-GMS, 2001 WL 65740 (D. Del. Jan. 9, 2001). 3. Has AES-PR, as a matter of law, failed to meet its burden of proving that it satisfied the

contractual conditions precedent to ALSTOM's warranty obligations under the accelerated corrosion warranty in Section 1.6 of the General Terms and Conditions of ALSTOM's Contract with D/FD? Authority: Weiss v. Nw. Broad. Inc., 140 F. Supp 2d 336, 343 (D. Del. 2001); Oberly v. Howard Hughes Med. Institute, 472 A. 2d 366, 386 (Del. Ch. 1984); Marker v. United States, 646 F.Supp. 433 (D. Del. 1986); 4000 Old Pali Rd. Partners v. Lone Star, 862 P.2d 282 (Haw. Ct. App. 1993). 4. Has AES-PR, as a matter of law, failed to meet its burden of proving that it monitored

and controlled properly the chloride content of the CDS spray water as required in the O&M Manuals? Authority: Weiss v. Nw. Broad. Inc., 140 F. Supp 2d 336, 343 (D. Del. 2001); Oberly v. Howard Hughes Med. Institute, 472 A. 2d 366, 386 (Del. Ch. 1984); Marker v. United States, 646 F.Supp. 433 (D. Del. 1986). 5. Has AES-PR, as a matter of law, failed to meet its burden of proving that it maintained

records regarding the chloride content of the CDS spray water as required in the O&M Manuals? Authority: Weiss v. Nw. Broad. Inc., 140 F. Supp 2d 336, 343 (D. Del. 2001); Oberly v. Howard Hughes Med. Institute, 472 A. 2d 366, 386 (Del. Ch. 1984); Marker v. United States, 646 F.Supp. 433 (D. Del. 1986); 4000 Old Pali Rd. Partners v. Lone Star, 862 P.2d 282 (Haw. Ct. App. 1993).

13

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 17 of 108

6.

Has AES-PR, as a matter of law, failed to meet its burden of proving that it monitored

and controlled the chloride content of the ash in the CDS as required in the O&M Manuals? Authority: Weiss v. Nw. Broad. Inc., 140 F. Supp 2d 336, 343 (D. Del. 2001); Oberly v. Howard Hughes Med. Institute, 472 A. 2d 366, 386 (Del. Ch. 1984); Marker v. United States, 646 F.Supp. 433 (D. Del. 1986). 7. Has AES-PR, as a matter of law, failed to meet its burden of proving that it maintained

records regarding the chloride content of the ash in the CDS as required in the O&M Manuals? Authority: Weiss v. Nw. Broad. Inc., 140 F. Supp 2d 336, 343 (D. Del. 2001); Oberly v. Howard Hughes Med. Institute, 472 A. 2d 366, 386 (Del. Ch. 1984); Marker v. United States, 646 F.Supp. 433 (D. Del. 1986); 4000 Old Pali Rd. Partners v. Lone Star, 862 P.2d 282 (Haw. Ct. App. 1993). 8. Has AES-PR, as a matter of law, failed to meet its burden of proving that it properly

adjusted the CDS outlet temperature based upon the chloride content of the CDS spray water or the ash in the CDS as required in the O&M Manuals? Authority: Weiss v. Nw. Broad. Inc., 140 F. Supp 2d 336, 343 (D. Del. 2001); Oberly v. Howard Hughes Med. Institute, 472 A. 2d 366, 386 (Del. Ch. 1984); Marker v. United States, 646 F.Supp. 433 (D. Del. 1986). 9. Has AES-PR, as a matter of law, failed to meet its burden of proving that it maintained

records establishing that it adjusted the CDS outlet temperature based upon the chloride content of the CDS spray water and the ash in the CDS as required in the O&M Manuals? Authority: Weiss v. Nw. Broad. Inc., 140 F. Supp 2d 336, 343 (D. Del. 2001); Oberly v. Howard Hughes Med. Institute, 472 A. 2d 366, 386 (Del. Ch. 1984); Marker v. United States,

14

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 18 of 108

646 F.Supp. 433 (D. Del. 1986); 4000 Old Pali Rd. Partners v. Lone Star, 862 P.2d 282 (Haw. Ct. App. 1993). 10. Has AES-PR, as a matter of law, failed to meet its burden of proving that it properly

maintained records establishing that it performed maintenance of the CDS spray nozzles as required in the O&M Manuals? Authority: Weiss v. Nw. Broad. Inc., 140 F. Supp 2d 336, 343 (D. Del. 2001); Oberly v. Howard Hughes Med. Institute, 472 A. 2d 366, 386 (Del. Ch. 1984); Marker v. United States, 646 F.Supp. 433 (D. Del. 1986); 4000 Old Pali Rd. Partners v. Lone Star, 862 P.2d 282 (Haw. Ct. App. 1993). 11. Has AES-PR, as a matter of law, failed to meet its burden of proving that it increased the

CDS outlet temperature during the operation of soot blowers in the CFB Boilers as required in the O&M Manuals? Authority: Weiss v. Nw. Broad. Inc., 140 F. Supp 2d 336, 343 (D. Del. 2001); Oberly v. Howard Hughes Med. Institute, 472 A. 2d 366, 386 (Del. Ch. 1984); Marker v. United States, 646 F.Supp. 433 (D. Del. 1986). 12. Has AES-PR, as a matter of law, failed to meet its burden of proving that it maintained

records indicating that it increased the CDS outlet temperature during the operation of the soot blowers in the CFB Boilers as required in the O&M Manuals? Authority: Weiss v. Nw. Broad. Inc., 140 F. Supp 2d 336, 343 (D. Del. 2001); Oberly v. Howard Hughes Med. Institute, 472 A. 2d 366, 386 (Del. Ch. 1984); Marker v. United States, 646 F.Supp. 433 (D. Del. 1986); 4000 Old Pali Rd. Partners v. Lone Star, 862 P.2d 282 (Haw. Ct. App. 1993).

15

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 19 of 108

13.

Has AES-PR, as a matter of law, failed to meet its burden of proving that it recorded and

maintained other maintenance and operating data that was required to be maintained pursuant to the O&M Manuals? Authority: Weiss v. Nw. Broad. Inc., 140 F. Supp 2d 336, 343 (D. Del. 2001); Oberly v. Howard Hughes Med. Institute, 472 A. 2d 366, 386 (Del. Ch. 1984); Marker v. United States, 646 F.Supp. 433 (D. Del. 1986); 4000 Old Pali Rd. Partners v. Lone Star, 862 P.2d 282 (Haw. Ct. App. 1993). 14. Has AES-PR, as a matter of law, failed to meet its burden of proving that it is excused

from its non-performance of conditions precedent to its claim under the accelerated corrosion warranty based upon ALSTOM's conduct under the doctrines of estoppel and waiver? Authority: Benitec Austl. Ltd. v. Promega Corp., C.A. No. 04-889 JJF, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3545 (D. Del. Mar. 8, 2005); Wilson v. American Ins. Co., 209 A.2d 902 (Del. 1965); Collins v. Sussex Trust Co., C.A. No. 88C-JN-21, 1989 Del. Super. LEXIS 274 (June 15, 1989); AeroGlobal Capital Mgmt., LLC v. Cirrus Indus., 871 A.2d 428 (Del. 2005). 15. Has AES-PR, as a matter of law, failed to meet its burden of proving that the O&M

Manuals were amended in accordance with the terms of the Contract? Authority: Dececchis v. Evers; 174 A.2d 463 (1961); Continental Ins. Co. v. Rutledge & Co., 750 A.2d 1219 (Del. Ch. 2000). 16. Is AES-PR, as a matter of law, not entitled to recover under the accelerated corrosion

warranty for the cost of replacement collector plates that will not be installed during the fouryear period of ALSTOM's accelerated corrosion warranty? Authority: Hooten v. Kenneth B. Mumaw Plumbing & Heating Co., 318 A.2d 514, 519 (Md. 1974); 525 Main St. Corp. v. Eagle Roofing Co., 168 A.2d 33 (N.J. 1961); Kennedy v.

16

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 20 of 108

Acura, C.A. No. 01-4063, 2002 R.I. Super. LEXIS 121 (R.I. August 8, 2002); Abraham v. Volkswagen of America; 795 F.2d 238 (2nd Cir. 1985). 17. Is AES-PR, as a matter of law, not entitled to recover under the accelerated corrosion

warranty the costs of injecting water into the CFB Boilers, operating the Reverse Osmosis system, and installing and operating a brine concentrator and crystallizer unit that will not occur during the four-year period of ALSTOM's accelerated corrosion warranty? Authority : Hooten v. Kenneth B. Mumaw Plumbing & Heating Co., 318 A.2d 514, 519 (Md. 1974); 525 Main St. Corp. v. Eagle Roofing Co., 168 A.2d 33 (N.J. 1961); Kennedy v. Acura, C.A. No. 01-4063, 2002 R.I. Super. LEXIS 121 (R.I. August 8, 2002); Abraham v. Volkswagen of America; 795 F.2d 238 (2nd Cir. 1985). 18. Is AES-PR, as a matter of law, not entitled to recover under the accelerated corrosion

warranty the components of its claimed damages for costs that will be incurred after the fouryear period of ALSTOM's accelerated corrosion warranty? Authority : Hooten v. Kenneth B. Mumaw Plumbing & Heating Co., 318 A.2d 514, 519 (Md. 1974); 525 Main St. Corp. v. Eagle Roofing Co., 168 A.2d 33 (N.J. 1961); Kennedy v. Acura, C.A. No. 01-4063, 2002 R.I. Super. LEXIS 121 (R.I. August 8, 2002); Abraham v. Volkswagen of America; 795 F.2d 238 (2nd Cir. 1985). 19. Is AES-PR, as a matter of law, barred from recovering claimed consequential damages

allegedly related to the repair and replacement of corroded ESP collector plates under the terms of ALSTOM's Contract with D/FD that exclude recovery of incidental, special, or consequential damages?

17

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 21 of 108

Authority: Wood River Pipeline Co. v. Wilbros Eng'r Serv. Co., 738 P.2d 866 (Kan.1987); CitiSteel U.S.A., Inc. v. Gen. Elec. Co., No. Civ. A. 99-810-GMS, 2001 WL 65740 (D. Del. Jan. 9, 2001). 20. Is AES-PR, as a matter of law, barred from recovering the costs of purchasing, installing,

and operating the Reverse Osmosis system, injecting wastewater into the CFB Boilers, and purchasing, installing, and operating a brine concentrator and crystallizer unit under the terms of ALSTOM's Contract with D/FD that exclude recovery of incidental, special, or consequential damages? Authority: Wood River Pipeline Co. v. Wilbros Eng'r Serv. Co., 738 P.2d 866 (Kan.1987); CitiSteel U.S.A., Inc. v. Gen. Elec. Co., No. Civ. A. 99-810-GMS, 2001 WL 65740 (D. Del. Jan. 9, 2001). 21. Is AES-PR, as a matter of law, not entitled to recover under the accelerated corrosion

warranty claimed damages based upon future improvements to the Plant's water treatment system, including injection of water into the boiler, operating the Reverse Osmosis system, and the purchase, installation, and operation of a brine concentrator and crystallizer unit after the four-year period of ALSTOM's accelerated corrosion warranty? Authority: Hooten v. Kenneth B. Mumaw Plumbing & Heating Co., 318 A.2d 514 (Md. 1974); 525 Main St. Corp. v. Eagle Roofing Co., 168 A.2d 33 (N.J. 1961). 22. Is AES-PR, as a matter of law, barred from recovering claimed damages for

improvements to the Plant's water treatment system, including injection of water into the boiler, operating the Reverse Osmosis system, and the purchase, installation, and operation of a brine concentrator and crystallizer unit under the doctrine of disproportionality?

18

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 22 of 108

Authority: Long Island Lighting Co. v. IMO Industries, Inc., No. 85 Civ. 6392 (RO), 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5351 (S.D. N.Y. May 9, 1990). VI. LIST OF EXHIBITS A. AES-PR's List of Exhibits.

Exhibit No. P-1

Bates No.

Date

Document

Basis for Admission 401/402, 901 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 801, 803, 804 401/402; 801, 803 401/402, 1003 401/402; 801, 803 401/402; 801, 803

ALDEC0501491-1621 WILHEMAIL009831-32 WILHEMAIL003952-53 JT-00656-58

02/24/1998

Contract No. W419-44C0001 Tanca email attaching other email Tanca email attaching other emails Winchester letter to Toher

Basis for ALSTOM's objection FRE 106, 901

P-2

06/02/1997

FRE 401/402, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901, 1003(2) FRE 106, 1003(2) FRE 106, 401/402, 403, 801/802 FRE 106, 401/402, 801/802 FRE 106, 1003(2)

P-3

06/23/1997

P-4

10/10/1997

P-5 P-6

API 067361960 API 067336971 API 067438689

03/30/1999 12/29/1999

Purchase Order to EEC Flue Gas Cleaning System Performance Selection Excerpt from ABB Alstom Power Request for Quotation, No. 65005697-R Specification for Circulating Dry Scrubber Flue Gas Cleaning System Specification for Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP) Flue Gas Cleaning System

P-7

04/14/2000

P-8

05/10/2001

401/402; 1003

P-9

AESPR 021845-73

05/10/2001

401/402; 1003

FRE 106, 1003(2)

19

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 23 of 108

Exhibit No. P-10

Bates No.

Date

Document

Basis for Admission

08/2001

August 2001 EEC Operation 401/402, and Maintenance Manual ­ 1003 Volume 1 August 2001 EEC Operation and Maintenance Manual ­ Volume 2 August 2001 EEC Operation and Maintenance Manual ­ Volume 3 August 2001 EEC Operation and Maintenance Manual ­ Volume 4 August 2001 EEC Operation and Maintenance Manual ­ Volume 5 August 2001 EEC Operation and Maintenance Manual ­ Volume 6 August 2001 EEC Operation and Maintenance Manual ­ Volume 7 August 2001 EEC Operation and Maintenance Manual ­ Volume 8 August 2001 EEC Operation and Maintenance Manual ­ Volume 9 Excerpt from Alstom's Design and Operation Manual Volume 2, Circulating Fluidized Bed Steam Generator Instruction Manual 401/402, 801, 803

Basis for ALSTOM's objection FRE 1003(2)

P-11

08/2001

No objection

P-12

08/2001

No objection

P-13

08/2001

No objection

P-14

08/2001

No objection

P-15

08/2001

No objection

P-16

08/2001

No objection

P-17

08/2001

No objection

P-18

08/2001

No objection

P-19

ALDEC0500705 ALDEC0500710 ALDEC0500712-13

09/2001

FRE 106, 401/402, 801/802

20

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 24 of 108

Exhibit No. P-20

Bates No.

Date

Document

Basis for Admission 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 803

EEC-04107-11 07/09/2002

Fax from VanHooser to Foley with attachment Hognefelt Trip Report to AES-PR Rothe email

Basis for ALSTOM's objection FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901 FRE 401/402, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901

P-21

AL1-04943-53

07/29/2002

P-22

P-23

ROTHEMAIL006948 ALDEC0502058

08/13/2002

08/16/2002

AES Puerto Rico Daily Commissioning Report (8/16/02 ­ 8/17/02) AES Puerto Rico Daily Commissioning Report (8/17/02 ­ 8/17/02) AES Puerto Rico Daily Commissioning Report (9/6/02 ­ 9/7/02) Troubleshooting CDS Problems Rothe email attaching other email, with attached VanHooser letter to Jarvis (9/19/02) Campbell email attaching other email, with attachments Rothe email attaching other email, with attachment Rothe email attaching other emails Jarvis email attaching other emails

P-24

MAIDEMAIL016595-96 ALDEC0502060

08/17/2002

FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901

P-25

09/06/2002

FRE 401/402, 801/802

P-26

WVH00304

09/08/2002

P-27

API 067582728 L1-003413-14

09/19/2002

401/402, 801, 804, 901, 1003 401/402, 801, 803, 901, 1003

FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901, 1003(2) FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901, 1003(2)

P-28

MAIDEMAIL009205-09 API 067580508 JARVEMAIL016323-25 JARVEMAIL005928-31

09/23/2002

401/402, 801, 803

FRE 106, 401/402, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901, 1003(2) FRE 401/402, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802

P-29

10/02/2002

P-30

10/02/2002

401/402, 801, 803, 901, 1003 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803

P-31

10/07/2002

21

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 25 of 108

Exhibit No. P-32

Bates No.

Date

Document

Basis for Admission 401/402, 801, 803, 901

10/08/2002

Jarvis letter to VanHooser

P-33

P-34 P-35

ROTHEMAIL006750 API 067576970 API 0675766

10/09/2002

Rothe email

401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 901, 1003

10/09/2002 10/10/2002

Rothe email Jarvis email

P-36

AES-WC-101373

10/13/2002

API, DFD and AES 401/402, Agreement re: Requirements 801, 803, for Performance Acceptance 1003 Hognefelt Trip Report to AES-PR for 10/12/02 ­ 10/15/02 Hognefelt Summary of Trip Report to AES-PR 401/402, 801, 803

Basis for ALSTOM's objection FRE 106, 401/402, 801/802, 901, FRCP 37(c)(1) FRE 106, 401/402, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802 FRE 106, 401/402, 801/802, 901, 1003(2) FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901, 1003(2) FRE 401/402, 801/802

P-37

AL1-05902-07

10/15/2002

P-38

AL1-04941

10/16/2002

401/402, 801, 803

FRE 401/402, 801/802 FRE 801/802

P-39

W-018-0043345 A100-12 API 0675745 WVH00841

10/23/2002

Campbell letter to Lyda with 401/402, attachments 801, 803

P-40 P-41

11/05/2002 11/07/2002

P-42

CAMPEMAIL011007 API 0675653

11/14/2002

401/402, 801, 803 VanHooser handwritten 401/402, notes 801, 803, 901 VanHooser email with 401/402, attachment [CDS Cold Start- 801, 803, Up] 1003 Rothe email attaching other email 401/402, 801, 803

Rothe letter to Titus

FRE 401/402, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901 FRE 106, 401/402, 801/802, 1003(2) FRE 401/402, 801/802

P-43

11/14/2002

22

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 26 of 108

Exhibit No. P-44

Bates No.

Date

Document

Basis for Admission 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803, 1003 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803

API 067573540 API 067569193

11/19/2002

VanHooser email with attachment Titus letter to Rothe, attaching EEC Corrosion Warranty Nullification Coleman email

Basis for ALSTOM's objection FRE 401/402, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802, 1003(2) FRE 401/402, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802 FRE 801/802, 901

P-45

12/11/2002

P-46

P-47

JARVEMAIL004668 API 067567274 API 067566165 WARDEMAIL002408

12/18/2002

12/19/2002

VanHooser email attaching other email Rothe letter to Kimberl AES Puerto Rico Daily Commissioning Report (1/4/03 ­ 1/8/03) Coleman email attaching other email Jarvis email Bates email Wardell email attaching other emails Jarvis email

P-48 P-49

12/20/2002 01/08/2003

P-50

P-51 P-52 P-53

HUGH01/08/2003 EMAIL001730-31 API 0672596- 01/09/2003 98 AESPR01/15/2003 235457-58 AL1-04923-24 01/30/2003

P-54

AL1-05287-88

02/07/2003

P-55 P-56

L1-003507-08 AL1-04896906 COLEEMAIL001414-15 API 067626272

02/14/2003 02/20/2003

Rothe letter to Titus Hognefelt memo to Francis and Bradburn Jarvis email attaching other email

P-57

03/31/2003

FRE 106, 401/402, 801/802 FRE 106, 801/802 FRE 106, 801/802 FRE 106, 401/402, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901, 1003(2) FRE 401/402, 801/802 FRE 106, 401/402, 403, 801/802 FRE 801/802

P-58

04/07/2003

Rothe email with attachment 401/402, 801, 803 23

FRE 801/802

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 27 of 108

Exhibit No. P-59

Bates No.

Date

Document

Basis for Admission 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 411, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803, 901, 1003 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 803, 901

API 067625051 API 0676254 L-009145-48

04/16/2003

Rothe email

P-60 P-61

04/17/2003 05/29/2003

Rothe letter to Titus Rothe letter to Durante

P-62

API 067266062 AL1-07103-04

06/10/2003

Wardell email attaching other email Project Change Control

P-63

09/18/2003

Basis for ALSTOM's objection FRE 106, 401/402, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 403, 411, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901, 1003(2) FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901 FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901 FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901, 1003(2) FRE 801/802, 901 (no objection)

P-64

09/25/2003

Stinson memo to Sostre

P-65

09/26/2003

Stinson Progress Report 2

P-66

AESPR149608-09 AL1-05788-92

09/27/2003

Dyer email attaching other email Hognefelt Trip Report to AES-PR for 9/22/03 ­ 9/26/03 Purchase Order No. 03-1367

P-67

09/29/2003

P-68

AESPR 022333-34

10/03/2003

P-69

EEC-27332-46 10/09/2003

Performance Test Plan

P-70

AESPR233998-99 AESPR233993-97

10/09/2003

Sostre email

P-71

10/13/2003

Sostre email with attachments Excerpt from Release and Settlement Agreement

P-72

10/31/2003

401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 403

FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901 FRE 106, 401/402, 801/802, 901 FRE 801/802, 901 FRE 801/802, 901 FRE 106

24

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 28 of 108

Exhibit No. P-73

Bates No.

Date

Document

Basis for Admission 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803

AESPR 022335

10/31/2003

Copy of AES Puerto Rico, LP check payable to United Titanium Inc. Jarvis email

Basis for ALSTOM's objection FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901

P-74

P-75

JANNEMAIL037371 LPI-00815

11/20/2003

FRE 801/802

11/21/2003

Rothe email

P-76 P-77

L1-001761

11/24/2003 11/26/2003

Dyer letter to Jarvis Hognefelt Trip Report to AES-PR for 11/22/03 ­ 11/25/03 Purchase Order No. 03-1842

401/402, 803, 1003

FRE 401/402, 403, 411, 801/802, 1003(2) FRE 403, 411, 1003(2) (no objection)

P-78

AESPR 022481-85 AESPR176410-11 L1-001760

11/26/2003

P-79

12/05/2003

Purchase Order No. 03-1915

P-80

12/11/2003

Rothe letter to Hucks

P-81

AESPR 022354-56 AESPR 022358-60 AESPR 022341 AESPR 022351-53 AESPR 007184-85 AESPR172040-61

12/15/2003

Invoice to AES Puerto Rico LP Invoice to AES Puerto Rico LP Copy of AES Puerto Rico LP check payable to United Titanium Inc. Invoice to AES Puerto Rico LP Stinson email Sostre email with attachments

P-82

12/15/2003

P-83

12/19/2003

P-84

12/23/2003

P-85 P-86

01/02/2004 01/09/2004

401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 411, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803, 901, 1003 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 901 401/402, 801, 803, 901

FRE 801/802, 901 FRE 801/802, 901 FRE 106, 401/402, 403, 411, 801/802 FRE 801/802, 901, 1003(2) FRE 801/802, 901 FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901 FRE 801/802, 901 FRE 801/802, 901 FRE 801/802, 901

25

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 29 of 108

Exhibit No. P-87

Bates No.

Date

Document

Basis for Admission 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 411, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803

AESPR120711 L1-001751-52

01/11/2004

Sostre email

Basis for ALSTOM's objection FRE 801/802, 901 FRE 401/402, 403, 411, 801/802 FRE 801/802

P-88

01/13/2004

Rothe letter to Hucks

P-89

AL1-05722-23

01/13/2004

Hognefelt email attaching other email Wilhelm email attaching other emails

P-90

JARVEMAIL064720-22 ALDEC0500008-09 WILHEMAIL004938-40 AESPR119145 AESPR 000331-33 JARVEMAIL065149-50 JARVEMAIL073911-12 L-011055-58 LINDEMAIL000711-12 COSTEMAIL005350-51

01/15/2004

FRE 801/802

P-91 P-92

01/15/2004 01/16/2004

Fishburn email Dyer email attaching other email

401/402, 801, 803

FRE 801/802 (no objection)

P-93 P-94

01/16/2004 01/16/2004

Jarvis email Dyer letter to Jarvis with attachment Buchholz email 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 411, 801, 803, 804 401/402, 411, 801, 803, 804

(no objection) FRE 801/802

P-95

01/20/2004

FRE 401/402, 403, 411, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 403, 411, 801/802 FRE 801/802 FRE 801/802

P-96

01/20/2004

Jarvis email

P-97 P-98

01/21/2004 01/27/2004

Dyer letter to Jarvis

401/402, 801 Lindau email attaching other 401/402, emails 801, 803, 804 Fishburn email 401/402, 801, 803

P-99

01/27/2004

FRE 801/802

26

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 30 of 108

Exhibit No. P-100

Bates No.

Date

Document

Basis for Admission 401/402, 411, 801, 803, 901, 1003 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 803, 901

L-011053

01/29/2004

Rothe letter to Hucks

P-101

L-011054

01/29/2004

Invoice to EEC

Basis for ALSTOM's objection FRE 106, 401/402, 403, 411, 801/802, 901, 1003(2) FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901 FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901

P-102

AESPR 022470-76

01/30/2004

Copy of AES Puerto Rico LP check payable to F.L. Smidth Airtech, Inc. with supporting documentation Summary for Billing

P-103

AESPR 027160-61 PANOEMAIL004472 AESPR 027207-08

02/01/2004

P-104

02/03/2004

Jarvis email

401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803, 901, 1003, 401/402, 801, 803, 1003 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 411, 801, 803 401/402, 411, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803

FRE 801/802, 901 FRE 801/802

P-105

02/02/2004

Summary for Billing

FRE 106, 801/802, 901, 1003(2) FRE 801/802, 1003(2) FRE 801/802

P-106

AL1-05628-31

02/10/2004

Dyer email attaching other emails Hognefelt memo to Bringfors Rothe letter to Beers

P-107

AL1-05620-22

02/19/2004

P-108

LP1-00529-32

02/27/2004

P-109

ALDEC0501144-45 JARVEMAIL065003-04 HOGNEMAIL000624-26

03/01/2004

Rothe email attaching other emails Dyer email

P-110

03/08/2004

FRE 401/402, 403, 411, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 403, 411, 801/802 FRE 801/802

P-111

03/08/2004

Hognefelt email attaching other emails

401/402, 801, 803

FRE 801/802

27

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 31 of 108

Exhibit No. P-112

Bates No.

Date

Document

Basis for Admission 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803

P-113

GABREMAIL000885 JARVEMAIL074062-63 L-010648-49

03/08/2004

Gabrielli email

03/10/2004

Jarvis email

Basis for ALSTOM's objection FRE 106, 401/402, 801/802 FRE 801/802

P-114

03/11/2004

Alstom cover letter with attached Invoice Number CS-04-301 dated 01/29/04 Rothe letter to Beers with attachment Jarvis email attaching other emails

401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 411, 801, 803 401/402, 411, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 411, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 803

FRE 801/802, 901

P-115

LP1-00646-48

03/12/2004

P-116

WARDEMAIL030456-57 AESPR 000272-75 AESPR 022454

03/29/2004

FRE 401/402, 403, 411, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 403, 411, 801/802 FRE 801/802 FRE 801/802, 901 FRE 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901 FRE 401/402, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 403, 411, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901 FRE 801/802

P-117 P-118

04/30/2004 05/14/2004

Dyer letter to Jarvis Copy of AES Puerto Rico LP check payable to ICE Jarvis letter to Dyer Copy of AES Puerto Rico LP check payable to ICE Dyer letter to Jarvis Jarvis email

P-119 P-120 AESPR 022441

05/18/2004 06/18/2004

P-121 P-122 ROTHEMAIL010317 AESPR 022393 WILHEMAIL004919-20 AESPR 022417

06/22/2004 06/28/2004

P-123

07/15/2004

Copy of AES Puerto Rico, LP check payable to ICE Wilhelm email attaching other email

P-124

07/28/2004

P-125

07/30/2004

Copy of AES Puerto Rico LP check payable to ICE

401/402, 801, 803, 901

FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901

28

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 32 of 108

Exhibit No. P-126

Bates No.

Date

Document

Basis for Admission

ALTRAN 000137-38 AESPR 022382-88

08/27/2004

P-127

09/02/2004

VanHooser letter to McKrell 401/402, 411, 801, 803, 901 Copy of AES Puerto Rico, 401/402, LP check payable to ICE 801, 803, with supporting 901 documentation Gabrielli email attaching other email Joint Defense Agreement 401/402, 411, 801, 803 401/402, 411, 801, 803, 804 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 901

Basis for ALSTOM's objection FRE 401/402, 403, 411, 801/802, 901 FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901

P-128

09/13/2004

FRE 106, 403, 411, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 403, 411, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901 FRE 801/802, 901 (no objection) (no objection) (no objection)

P-129

A-DB-0011927 AL1-02282

10/28/2004

P-130

02/25/2005

Alstom statement

P-131

AESPR208210-20

08/10/2005

Etienne letter to Dyer with attachment Dyer letter to O'Neill Site Layout Plan Photograph

P-132 P-133 P-134 P-135 AESPR 432964-79

11/17/2005

04/11/2006

Heins letter to Rivera with attachment

P-136

AESPR 432981

04/12/2006

Etienne letter to Rivera

P-137

AESPR 432980

04/13/2006

Randall letter to Rivera

401/402, 801, 803, 901, FRCP 26(e)(2) 401/402, 801, 803, 901, FRCP 26(e)(2) 401/402, 801, 803, 901, FRCP 26(e)(2)

FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901, FRCP37(c)(1)

FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901, FRCP37(c)(1)

FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901, FRCP37(c)(1)

29

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 33 of 108

Exhibit No. P-138

Bates No.

Date

Document

Basis for Admission 401/402, 801, 803, 901, FRCP 26(e)(2) 401/402, 801, 803, 901, FRCP 26(e)(2) 401/402, 801, 901 401/402, 801 901

AESPR 432982-88

04/17/2006

Randall letter to Rivera with attachment

Basis for ALSTOM's objection FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901, FRCP37(c)(1)

P-139

AESPR 432939-63

04/19/2006

Randall letter to Alequin with attachment

FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901, FRCP37(c)(1)

P-140 P-141 AESPR137005-34

Undated Undated

Drawing of equipment AES-Puerto Rico slide presentation [ESP Corrosion] AES-Puerto Rico slide presentation [Water treatment] Spreadsheet listing EEC Non-Conformances Alstom web page "About us" Alstom web page presentation [The FullService Provider in Power Generation] Summary of Modification Work Handwritten drawing Handwritten drawing

FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901 FRE 801/802, 901

P-142

AESPR194940-47

Undated

401/402, 801 901

FRE 801/802, 901

P-143

Undated

P-144

Undated

P-145

Undated

401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 803, 901

FRE 801/802, 901 FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901 FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901

P-146

Undated

P-147 P-148

WVH00182

Undated Undated

401/402, 801, 803, 901 401/402, 801, 901 401/402, 801, 901

FRE 801/802, 901 FRE 801/802, 901 FRE 106, 401/402, 801/802, 901, 1003(2) FRE 901

P-149

Piece of corroded collector plate

401/402, 901

30

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 34 of 108

Exhibit No. P-150

Bates No.

Date

Document

Basis for Admission 401/402, 901 401/402, 901 401/402, 901

Piece of corroded collector plate Piece of corroded collector plate FBHE handcuff Photograph Purchase Spreadsheet

Basis for ALSTOM's objection FRE 901

P-151

FRE 901

P-152 P-153 P-154

FRE 901 (no objection)

401/402, 801, 803, 901, 1003 401/402, 801, 803, 901, 1003 401/402, 801, 803, 901, 1003 401/402, 801, 803, 901, 1003 401/402, 801, 803, 901, 1003 401/402, 901 401/402, 901

P-155

AESPR 432690-92 AESPR 432704-06 AESPR 432609-10 AESPR 432621-22 AESPR 432459-61 AESPR 432473-75

04/03/2003

Emissions Report Unit 1 Q1 2003 Emissions Report Unit 2 Q1 2003 Emissions Report Unit 1 Q2 2003 Emissions Report Unit 2 Q2 2003 Emissions Report Unit 1 Q3 2003 Emissions Report Unit 2 Q3 2003 Photograph Photograph Photograph Photograph Photograph

P-156

04/03/2003

P-157

07/29/2003

P-158

07/29/2003

P-159

10/08/2003

FRE 106, 401/402, 801/802, 901, 1003(2) FRE 106, 801/802, 901, 1003(2) FRE 106, 801/802, 901, 1003(2) FRE 106, 801/802, 901, 1003(2) FRE 106, 401/402, 801/802, 901 FRE 106, 901

P-160

10/08/2003

FRE 106, 901

P-161 P-162 P-163 P-164 P-165

(no objection) (no objection) 401/402, 901 FRE 901 (no objection) (no objection)

31

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 35 of 108

Exhibit No. P-166 P-167 P-168 P-169 P-170 P-171 P-172 P-173 P-174 P-175 P-176 P-177 P-178 P-179 P-180

Bates No.

Date

Document

Basis for Admission 401/402, 901 401/402, 901 401/402, 901 401/402, 901 401/402, 901 401/402, 901 401/402, 901 401/402, 901 401/402, 901

Photograph Photograph Photograph Photograph Photograph Photograph Photograph Photograph Photograph Photograph Photograph Photograph Photograph Drawing of Equipment AL1-05778-79 01/09/2004 Sostre email

Basis for ALSTOM's objection FRE 901 FRE 901 FRE 901 FRE 901 FRE 901 FRE 901 FRE 901 FRE 901 FRE 901 (no objection)

401/402, 901 401/402, 901

FRE 901 FRE 901 (no objection)

P-181

P-182

ROTHEMAIL036791 ALDEC0501147

11/21/2003

Rothe email

11/21/2003

Rothe email

401/402, 801, 901 401/402, 801, 803, 1003 401/402, 411, 801, 803 401/402, 411, 801, 803, 1003 401/402, 801, 803

P-183

ALDEC0500977-81

12/20/2002

Rothe letter to Kimberl

FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901 FRE 106, 801/802, 901, 1003(2) FRE 401/402, 403, 411, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 403, 411, 801/802, 1003(2) FRE 401/402, 801/802

32

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 36 of 108

Exhibit No. P-184

Bates No.

Date

Document

Basis for Admission 401/402, 801, 803, 901, 1003

L1-003470-71 L1-003413-14

09/19/2002

Rothe email attaching other email, with attached VanHooser letter to Jarvis (9/19/02) Flue Gas Cleaning System Performance Selection Dyer letter to Jarvis

Basis for ALSTOM's objection FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901, 1003(2)

P-185

AL1-05449-51

12/29/1999

401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 803

FRE 401/402, 403, 801/802 FRE 801/802

P-186

P-187

P-188

AESPR 000276-77 AES2-0401147-48 WARDEMAIL027135 JARVEMAIL077626-27

01/21/2004

02/03/2004

Jarvis email

401/402, 801, 803 401/402, 411, 801, 803 401/402, 801, 901 401/402, 801 401/402, 801 401/402, 801, 803, 901

FRE 801/802

03/01/2004

Rothe email attaching other emails Subpoena to Altran Corporation Vittoria letter to Williams Vittoria email with attachments Capital Project Report

P-189

10/12/2005

FRE 401/402, 403, 411, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802, 901 FRE 401/402, 801/802 FRE 401/402, 801/802 FRE 106, 801/802, 901

P-190 P-191

11/22/2005 04/25/2006

P-192

33

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 37 of 108

B.

ALSTOM's List of Exhibits. Date Description Basis for Admission 401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 901 401 801(c) 901 Basis for AES-PR Objections1 Relevance; prejudice; incomplete

Exhibit Number D-001

4/3/1996

EPC Contract between AES and D/FD

D-002

5/6/1997

D-003

6/19/1997

Newspaper Article "Environmentalists speak out against EPA" Letter re: Comments from Scientific and Technical Services Inc. Contract No. W419-44-C0001 Between D/FD and ABB Combustion Engineering; Signature Document; Scope of Work; Commercial Terms; General Terms; Specifications Letter re: Request for Denial of AESPuerto Rico Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Air Permit Purchase Order for Precipitator, Dry Scrubber

Hearsay

Hearsay; foundation

D-004

2/24/1998

D-005

8/20/1998

D-006

3/30/1999

401 801(c) 901 401 801(c) 803(6) 901

Hearsay; prejudice; foundation Authenticity; multiple documents; hearsay

1

As used in this column, "relevance" refers to Federal Rules of Evidence 401 and 402; "prejudice" refers to Federal Rule of Evidence 403; "hearsay" refers to Federal Rule of Evidence 801, 802 and 805; "authenticity" refers to Federal Rule of Evidence 901; "foundation" refers to Federal Rules of Evidence 602 and 901; "multiple documents" refers to Federal Rules of Evidence 401, 402, 403, 1001, 1002, and 1003; "incomplete" refers to Federal Rules of Evidence 106, 401, 402, and 403; "inadmissible demonstrative" refers to Federal Rules of Evidence 401, 402, 403, and 901; "opinion" refers to Federal Rule of Evidence 701; and "best evidence" refers to Federal Rule of Evidence 101, 1002, 1003, 1006. AES-PR does not concede that ALSTOM's descriptions of the documents on this list are accurate. Objection to "hearsay" includes hearsay within hearsay. Objection to "prejudice" includes all grounds specified in Federal Rule of Evidence 403.

34

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 38 of 108

Exhibit Number D-007

Date

Description

Basis for Admission 401 801(c) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 803(6) 807 901 401 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 803(6) 807 901

12/14/1999 Black & Veatch's Preliminary Draft Due Diligence Report for Goldman, Sachs & Co.

Basis for AES-PR Objections1 Hearsay

D-008

1/11/2000

E-Mail re: Bank's Engineer's Report

Hearsay

D-009

1/25/2000

E-Mail re: ABBCE & EEC CDS, Vessel Corrosion re: Bank's Engineer's Report

Hearsay; foundation

D-010

1/25/2000

Handwritten notes of CE-D/FD Conf. Call

Hearsay; incomplete

D-011

2/8/2000

E-mail re: AES-PR ABBCE/DFD/AES 2/10 & 11 Mtg Agenda

Hearsay

D-012

2/21/2000

E-mail re: Corrosion Reference List/EEC Correspondence #420584E046

Foundation; hearsay

D-013

2/21/2000

E-mail re: AES - PR - EEC Corrosion Reference List

Foundation; hearsay

D-014

2/23/2000

E-mail re: AES-PR-Corrosion Experience List/EEC

Foundation; hearsay

D-015

2/24/2000

E-mail re: RE: Info Needed for Bank's Engineer

35

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 39 of 108

Exhibit Number D-016

Date

Description

Basis for Admission 401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901

2/28/2000

E-mail Re: AES/PR: ABBCE/DFD/AES/EEC/S&W Record of Meeting 2/10 & 11/00

Basis for AES-PR Objections1 Foundation; hearsay

D-017

3/2/2000

E-mail re: RE: AES - PR - Info Needed for Bank's Engineer

Foundation; hearsay

D-018

3/14/2000

E-mail re: AES/PR: ABBCE/DFD/AES CFB Boiler, CDS Meeting Minutes 2/10&11 2000

Foundation; hearsay

D-019

5/3/2000

Letter No. AES-DFD-010 re: AES Puerto Rico Project Additional Scope Item 3 Water Supply System

Relevance; prejudice

D-020

5/10/2000

Black & Veatch Due Diligence Report

Hearsay

D-021

5/30/2000

Letter No. 3674-0-CR-9-00515 re: Change Order C-063 Modify Demin. Treatment Based Upon Revised Treated Water Analysis

Hearsay; relevance; prejudice

D-022 D-023

2/20/2001 3/28/2001

E-mail re: ALSTOM Training Program Letter of Transmittal No.: 00648 re: Analog Logic

401 801(c) 803(6) 807 901

Multiple documents

36

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 40 of 108

Exhibit Number D-024

Date

Description

Basis for Admission 401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 803(6) 807 901

4/19/2001

Supplier Transmittal No. 196

Basis for AES-PR Objections1 Authenticity

D-025

5/15/2001

E-mail re: AES - PR - EEC CDS Maintenance and Monitoring Plan

Hearsay

D-026

5/31/2001

D-027

8/1/2001

Letter No. 3674-0-CR-9-05081 re: CFB Boiler & CDS Equipment Performance Related Information and Limits of Control Operation and Maintenance Manual; Volume 1

D-028

9/1/2001

Air Pollution Control System (Desulphurization & Particulate Control) Training Manual; with handwritten "G. Bates"

D-029

9/1/2001

Air Pollution Control System (Desulphurization Particulate Control) Training Manual; with handwritten "Elias M. Sostre"

D-030

9/24/2001

Supplier Transmittal #276

D-031

10/2/2001

E-mail re: AES-PR-EEC Functional Checks

401 801(c) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901 401 803(6) 807 901

Incomplete; multiple documents

Multiple documents; second document contains hearsay Incomplete

Not previously produced

Hearsay

37

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 41 of 108

Exhibit Number D-032

Date

Description

Basis for Admission 401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901

10/25/2001 Letter re: AES Training Video Tapes

Basis for AES-PR Objections1 Not previously produced; multiple documents, second document ­ relevance, hearsay

D-033 D-034

10/31/2001 Letter re: API Training Program Video Tape Transmittal 6/18/2002 Letter re: Current Operating Makeup Water System - Off-Site Influent Water Quality

401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901

Hearsay; foundation; multiple documents

D-035

7/26/2002

D-036

7/29/2002

Letter re: AES Concurrence with DFD Approach to Air Emissions Compliance Letter re: PRASA Water Source

D-037

1/13/2003

Copy of handwritten notes

D-038

1/17/2003

E-mail re: Trip Report

401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901

Hearsay; relevance; prejudice; foundation

Hearsay, foundation; authenticity

Hearsay

D-039

2/12/2003

E-mail re: Dewcon humidity transmitter at #2 CDS outlet

38

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 42 of 108

Exhibit Number D-040

Date

Description

Basis for Admission 401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 803(6) 803(7) 807 901

2/18/2003

AES Puerto Rico Purchase Orders

Basis for AES-PR Objections1 Multiple documents; authenticity

D-041 D-042

3/4/2003 3/4/2003

E-mail re: Shift Report Kohl Report

Hearsay; foundation

D-043 D-044 D-045

3/12/2003 3/22/2003 4/10/2003

E-mail re: Shift report E-mail re: Shift Report GE Betz Technical Report

D-046

5/15/2003

E-mail re: AES/PR: Particualte Matter Testing

D-047

5/24/2003

Report re: Unit 1 & 2

D-048

5/25/2003

E-mail re: Nightly Report 05/24/03

D-049

6/9/2003

Complaint Re: AES Puerto Rico, L.P. v. D/FD, et al., Civil No. 03-544 (U.S.D.C. Del.),

401 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 803(6) 803(7) 807 901 401 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 807 901

Hearsay; incomplete

Hearsay

Authenticity; incomplete; foundation

Foundation; hearsay

Relevance; prejudice

39

Case 1:04-cv-01282-JJF

Document 127

Filed 05/01/2006

Page 43 of 108

Exhibit Number D-050 D-051 D-052

Date

Description

Basis for Admission

Basis for AES-PR Objections1

6/18/2003 7/10/2003 7/11/2003

Letter 3674-0-CR-9-05968 re: Unit 2 Emissions Testing Results E-mail re: Unit Nightly Report 07/09/03 Amended Complaint Re: AES Puerto Rico, L.P. v. D/FD, et al., Civil No. 03-0544-JJF (U.S.D.C. Del.)

D-053

8/8/2003

E-mail re: FW: AES/PR: Unit 1 CDS Low Load Operation Test

401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 807 901 401 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901

Relevance; prejudice

E-mails in string contain hearsay

D-054 D-055 D-056

8/10/2003 8/15/2003 8/29/2003

E-mail Re: RE: YTD Reports on Safety / Environmental / FO's E-mail re: EOS Report, Days, 08/15/03 Kohl Report

401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901 401 801(c) 801(d)(2) 803(6) 807 901

Hearsay; foundation

D-057 D-058

8/30/2003 9/4/2003

E-mail re: Controlling Opacity E-mail re: Controlling Opacity

Hearsay

D-059

9/6/2003

E-mail re: FW: AES-PR trip report

Hearsay; foundation

D-060

9/8/2003

Letter re: Notification of Reportable Deviations of Stack Emissions Above Permit Lim