Free Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California - California


File Size: 38.7 kB
Pages: 1
Date: June 20, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 329 Words, 2,080 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/264961/40.pdf

Download Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California ( 38.7 kB)


Preview Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cr-00644-LAB

Document 40

Filed 06/20/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: 08cr644 LAB TITLE: USA v. Orozco-Aguirre E-FILED DATE: 6/18/08 DOCUMENT TITLE: Proposed Jury Instructions DOCUMENT FILED Randy Jones for USA BY:

DOCKET NO.: 28

Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: x Civil Local Rule or Discrepancy
Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

ECF § 2(h) ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(g) ECF § 2(f) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Civ. L. Rule 15.1 X Chambers Standing Order - Criminal

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Lacking proper signature Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/document(s) are not timely Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing table of contents and/or table of authorities Amended pleading not complete in itself OTHER: Proposed jury instructions must be filed no later than the Friday before trial is to begin.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents X may be stricken from the record. The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties. Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1.

DATED: 6-2-08

BY:

RLS, Judicial Assistant Chambers of Larry Alan Burns United States District Judge