Free Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California - California


File Size: 39.2 kB
Pages: 1
Date: June 3, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 327 Words, 2,066 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/265175/9.pdf

Download Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California ( 39.2 kB)


Preview Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cr-00680-LAB

Document 9

Filed 06/03/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: 08cr680 LAB TITLE: USA v. Salgado-Ramon E-FILED DATE: 5/29/08 DOCKET NO.: 8 DOCUMENT TITLE: Sentencing Summary Chart DOCUMENT FILED Randy Jones for USA BY: Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: x Civil Local Rule or Discrepancy
Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

ECF § 2(h) ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(g) ECF § 2(f) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 X Crim L. Rule 32.1 and Chambers Standing Order - Criminal Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Civ. L. Rule 15.1

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Lacking proper signature Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/document(s) are not timely: Sentencing Summary Charts shall be filed 5 calendar days before the Sentencing hearing. Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing table of contents and/or table of authorities Amended pleading not complete in itself OTHER:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents X may be stricken from the record. The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties. Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1.

DATED: 6/3/08

BY: RLS, Judicial Assistant Chambers of Larry Alan Burns United States District Judge