Free Scheduling Order - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-00432-JLS-JMA

Document 13

Filed 06/16/2008

Page 1 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a telephonic Case Management Conference was held on June 13, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. After consulting with the attorneys of record for v. MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., etc., et al., ASHLEA PARKER, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 08-CV-0432-JLS (JMA) CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER REGULATING DISCOVERY AND OTHER PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16) (Local Rule 16.1) (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

the parties and being advised of the status of the case, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Any motion to join other parties, to amend the

pleadings, or to file additional pleadings shall be filed on or before August 11, 2008. //

08cv0432

Case 3:08-cv-00432-JLS-JMA

Document 13

Filed 06/16/2008

Page 2 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

2.

A telephonic Case Management Conference shall be held

before Magistrate Judge Adler on September 9, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. Counsel for each party shall appear telephonically at this conference. 3. The Court will initiate the conference call.

The parties shall serve on all other parties a list of

experts whom that party expects to call at trial on or before October 24, 2008. On or before November 7, 2008, any party may

supplement its designation in response to any other party's designation, so long as that party has not previously retained an expert to testify on that subject. Expert designations shall

include the name, address, and telephone number of each expert, and a reasonable summary of the testimony the expert is expected to provide. The list shall also include the normal rates the

expert charges for deposition and trial testimony. The parties must identify any person who may be used at trial to present evidence pursuant to Rules 702, 703 or 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. to retained experts. Please be advised that failure to comply with this section or any other discovery order of the Court may result in the sanctions provided for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, including a prohibition on the introduction of experts or other designated matters in evidence. 4. All expert disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. This requirement is not limited

26(a)(2) shall be served on all parties on or before January 16, 2009. Any contradictory or rebuttal information shall be In addition, Fed. R.

disclosed on or before February 13, 2009.

Civ. P. 26(e)(1) imposes a duty on the parties to supplement the

2

08cv0432

Case 3:08-cv-00432-JLS-JMA

Document 13

Filed 06/16/2008

Page 3 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

expert disclosures made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) by the time that pretrial disclosures are due under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) (discussed below). This disclosure requirement

applies to all persons retained or specially employed to provide expert testimony, or whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involve the giving of expert testimony. Please be advised that failure to comply with this section or any other discovery order of the Court may result in the sanctions provided for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, including a prohibition on the introduction of experts or other designated matters in evidence. 5. All discovery, other than expert discovery, shall be All

completed by all parties on or before January 9, 2009.

expert discovery shall be completed by all parties on or before March 13, 2009. "Completed" means that all discovery under Rules

30 through 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure must be initiated a sufficient period of time in advance of the cutoff date, so that it may be completed by the cutoff date, taking into account the times for service, notice, and response as set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All disputes concerning

discovery shall be brought to the attention of Magistrate Judge Adler no later than thirty (30) days following the date upon which the event giving rise to the dispute occurred. For oral

discovery, the event giving rise to the discovery dispute is the completion of the transcript of the affected portion of the deposition. For written discovery, the event giving rise to the Counsel are

discovery dispute is the service of the response.

required to meet and confer prior to contacting the Court

3

08cv0432

Case 3:08-cv-00432-JLS-JMA

Document 13

Filed 06/16/2008

Page 4 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

regarding all discovery disputes pursuant to the requirements of Local Rules 16.5(k) and 26.1(a). 6. All motions, other than motions to amend or join

parties, or motions in limine, shall be filed on or before April 10, 2009.1 Motions will not be heard or calendared unless

counsel for the moving party has obtained a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the judge who will hear the motion. Be

advised that the period of time between the date you request a motion date and the hearing date may be up to sixty (60) days. Please plan accordingly. Failure of counsel to timely request a

motion date may result in the motion not being heard. Briefs or memoranda in support of or in opposition to any pending motion shall not exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length without leave of the judge who will hear the motion. No reply

memorandum shall exceed ten (10) pages without such leave of court. 7. A Mandatory Settlement Conference shall be conducted on

June 23, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. in the chambers of Magistrate Judge Adler. Counsel shall submit settlement statements directly to

Magistrate Judge Adler's chambers no later than June 16, 2009.2 The parties may either submit confidential settlement statements or may exchange their settlement statements. Each party's

settlement statement shall set forth the party's statement of the case, identify controlling legal issues, concisely set out issues Counsel should note that while historically motion cutoff deadlines issued by this Court were deadlines for motion hearings, the motion cutoff dates now being issued establish deadlines for the parties to file motions. Statements may be delivered directly to chambers, e-mailed to [email protected], or faxed to (619) 702-9939. 4
08cv0432
2 1

Case 3:08-cv-00432-JLS-JMA

Document 13

Filed 06/16/2008

Page 5 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

of liability and damages, and shall set forth the party's settlement position, including the last offer or demand made by that party, and a separate statement of the offer or demand the party is prepared to make at the settlement conference. The

settlement conference briefs shall not be filed with the Clerk of the Court. All named parties, all counsel, and any other person(s) whose authority is required to negotiate and enter into settlement shall appear in person at the conference. The

individual(s) present at the Mandatory Settlement Conference with settlement authority must have the unfettered discretion and authority on behalf of the party to: 1) fully explore all

settlement options and to agree during the Mandatory Settlement Conference to any settlement terms acceptable to the party (G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989)), 2) change the settlement position of a party during the course of the Mandatory Settlement Conference (Pitman v. Brinker Int'l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003)), and 3) negotiate a settlement without being restricted by any predetermined level of authority (Nick v. Morgan's Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596 (8th Cir. 2001)). Governmental entities may appear through litigation counsel only. As to all other parties, appearance by litigation counsel Retained outside corporate counsel shall

only is not acceptable.

not appear on behalf of a corporation as the party who has the authority to negotiate and enter into a settlement. The failure

of any counsel, party or authorized person to appear at the Mandatory Settlement Conference as required shall be cause for

5

08cv0432

Case 3:08-cv-00432-JLS-JMA

Document 13

Filed 06/16/2008

Page 6 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

the immediate imposition of sanctions.

All conference

discussions will be informal, off the record, privileged, and confidential. 8. Counsel shall serve on each other and file their

Memoranda of Contentions of Fact and Law and take any other action required by Local Rule 16.1(f)(2) on or before July 16, 2009. On or before this date, the parties must also comply with

the pretrial disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3). 9. Counsel shall confer and take the action required by

Local Rule 16.1(f)(4) on or before July 23, 2009. 10. The Proposed Final Pretrial Conference order, including

written objections, if any, to any party's Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) pretrial disclosures, shall be prepared, served, and lodged with the Clerk's Office on or before July 30, 2009 and shall be in the form prescribed in Local Rule 16.1(f)(6). Any

objections shall comply with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3). Please be advised that the failure to file written

objections to a party's pretrial disclosures may result in the waiver of such objections, with the exception of those made pursuant to Rules 402 (relevance) and 403 (prejudice, confusion or waste of time) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. 11. The final Pretrial Conference is scheduled on the

calendar of the Honorable Janis L. Sammartino on August 6, 2009 at 1:30 p.m. The trial date will be assigned by the district

judge at the pretrial conference. 12. The dates and times set forth herein will not be

modified except for good cause shown. //

6

08cv0432

Case 3:08-cv-00432-JLS-JMA

Document 13

Filed 06/16/2008

Page 7 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

13. Plaintiff's(s') counsel shall serve a copy of this order on all parties that enter this case hereafter. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 16, 2008 Jan M. Adler U.S. Magistrate Judge

7

08cv0432