Case 3:08-cv-00441-LAB-RBB
Document 26
Filed 08/04/2008
Page 1 of 1
MINUTES OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ARNELL v. JACK LIEB, ESQ. & ASSOC. HON. RUBEN B. BROOKS Plaintiffs Lantz Arnell CT. DEPUTY VICKY LEE Attorneys Defendants Cheryl Brierton Case No. 08cv0441 LAB(RBB) Time Spent: Rptr.
PROCEEDINGS:
In Chambers
In Court
Telephonic
Plaintiff has filed a Motion For Reconsideration of Denial of Plaintiff's Request For Court Order For Surveillance Video [doc. no. 25]. Upon a preliminary review of the Motion, the Court finds that the Motion is suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). Accordingly, the hearing set for September 8, 2008, at 10:00 a.m. is vacated. Any opposition to the Motion shall be filed by August 8, 2008. If an opposition is filed, Plaintiff may file a reply by August 15, 2008. The Motion will be submitted at that time.
DATE: cc:
August 1, 2008
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Judge Burns All Parties of Record
_________________________ Ruben B. Brooks, U.S. Magistrate Judge INITIALS: VL (mg/irc) Deputy
K:\COMMON\BROOKS\CASES\ARNELL441\MINUTE01.wpd