Free Notice (Other) - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-00454-H-LSP

Document 24

Filed 08/19/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4

Amy B. Vandeveld, SBN 137904 LAW OFFICES OF AMY B. VANDEVELD 1850 Fifth Avenue, suite 22 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone (619) 231-8883 Facsimile (619) 231-8329 Attorney for Plaintiff

5 6 7 8 9
1011

IN THE UNITED SOUTHERN KAREL SPIKES,
Plaintiff,

STATES DISTRICT

COURT

DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

o~
Case No.: CV l:. CV

0 u-S'1
.-

H

(LS p)

11

12 vs
13
11

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL AND DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
[F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41 (a) (1), (2)]

TEPI-NORTE MEX CITY; FRANCISCO CHAVEZ; CHRISTINA CHAVEZ; ROBERTO

14 15 16 17 18 19 20

II

BARNET dba OLD COTIJAS and DOES 1
THROUGH 10, Inclusive,
Defendants.

Plaintiff, "SPIKES"),

KAREL SPIKES, requests

(hereinafter

referred to Federal

to as Rules of

hereby

that, pursuant

Civil Procedure, dismissal without

Rule 41 (a) (1) and prejudice

(2), this Court enter a Complaint in USDC Case

of Plaintiff's

21
No. 08 CV 454 H (LSP) in it's entirety.

SPIKES further requests

22 that the Court order that parties shall bear his, her and/or its

23
24

own costs and fees.

F AMY B. VANDEVELD 25 26 27 28

DATED: ~

By:

Case 3:08-cv-00454-H-LSP

Document 24

Filed 08/19/2008

Page 2 of 2

PROOF OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, declare that: I am authorized to serve the following document(s) in the within action pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 4(c) and that the documents were served on today's date as follows:

1.

Case Name/USDC Number: Spikes v. Tepi Norte Mex-City. et. al. USDC No.: 08 cv 0454 H (LSP) Document(s) served: NOTICE OF DISMISSAL AND DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WOTHOUT PREJUDICE
Person(s) served/Place of service: Benjamin Martinez TEPI NORTE 1617 Woodville Ave Chula Vista, CA 91913-1577 Defendant

2.

3.

4.

Manner of Service:
(a) Personal Service: to the person served By handing [F.R.Civ.P. copies of the 5(b) (2) (A)].

document(s)

L

(b)

Service bv Mail:

I am "readily familiar" with

the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on the same day with postage thereon fully prepaid, at San Diego, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if the postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing

in the affidavit. [F.R.Civ.P. 5(b)
Procedure, Sections
(c)

(2) (B);

Cal. Code of Civil From Fax No. (619) 231-

1013a, 2015]

Facsimile Transmission:

8329 to the facsimile The facsimile machine error was reported by

number(s) listed on this proof of service. I used complied with Rule 2003(3), and no the machine. [[F.R.Civ.P. 5(b) (2) (D)].

I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California and the United States of America, that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed On:
~
.

J I5/DrC

By:
LAURIE MI

1