Free Order Dismissing Case - District Court of California - California


File Size: 57.5 kB
Pages: 2
Date: March 20, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 548 Words, 3,114 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/265761/2.pdf

Download Order Dismissing Case - District Court of California ( 57.5 kB)


Preview Order Dismissing Case - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00483-JM-PCL

Document 2

Filed 03/20/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ARDY CHADWICK, CDCR #T-13047, Plaintiff, vs. SAN DIEGO POLICE DEP'T, Defendant.

Civil No.

08-0483 JM (PCL)

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILING TO PAY FILING FEES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR MOVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)

Ardy Chadwick ("Plaintiff"), a state prisoner currently incarcerated at California Men's Colony in San Luis Obispo, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE OR REQUEST IFP STATUS All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $350. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party's failure to pay only if the party is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). Prisoners granted leave to proceed IFP however, remain
K:\COMMON\CHMB_MIL\__SIGNED ORDERS\3 20 2008\08cv0483-dismissNoIFP.wpd

1

08cv0483

Case 3:08-cv-00483-JM-PCL

Document 2

Filed 03/20/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

obligated to pay the entire fee in installments, regardless of whether the action is ultimately dismissed for any reason. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2). Here, Plaintiff has neither prepaid the $350 filing fee required to commence this action, nor has he submitted a Motion to Proceed IFP. Therefore, this action is subject to immediate dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). II. CONCLUSION AND ORDER For the reasons set forth above, the Court hereby: (1) 1915(a); and (2) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is stamped "Filed" to: (a) prepay the entire $350 civil filing fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to proceed IFP which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff with the Court's approved form "Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis." If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the $350 civil filing fee or complete and submit the attached Motion to Proceed IFP within that time, this action shall remain dismissed without prejudice and without further Order of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 20, 2008 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller United States District Judge DISMISSES this action sua sponte without prejudice for failing to pay the $350 filing fee or file a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and

K:\COMMON\CHMB_MIL\__SIGNED ORDERS\3 20 2008\08cv0483-dismissNoIFP.wpd

2

08cv0483