Free MOTION for Leave to File Further Motions - District Court of California - California


File Size: 52.8 kB
Pages: 1
Date: April 10, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 325 Words, 1,924 Characters
Page Size: 612.602 x 780.442 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/265826/13-3.pdf

Download MOTION for Leave to File Further Motions - District Court of California ( 52.8 kB)


Preview MOTION for Leave to File Further Motions - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cr-00764-BEN

Document 13-3

Filed 04/10/2008

Page 1 of 1

1

USA v. Jose Luis Angel Oliva-Vidrio Case No. 08-CR-764-BEN
PROOF OF SERVICE

2
3

4
5
6

I am employed in the County of San Diego, California; I am over the age of 18 years, and am not a party to the within action. My business address is 2044 First Avenue, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92101. I am readily familiar with my employer's business practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. On April 10, 2008, following ordinary business practice, served the following documents:
1.

7
8 9 10
11 12

I

2.

DEFENDANT, JOSE LUIS ANGEL OLIVA-VIDRIO'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR 1) DISCOVERY/PRESERVE EVIDENCE 2) LEAVE TO FILE MOTIONS POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR 1) DISCOVERY/PRESERVE EVIDENCE 2) LEAVE TO FILE ADDITIONAL MOTIONS

13 14 15 16 17 18

on the parties in said cause, by placing on that date at my place of business, a true copy thereof, enclosed in a sealed envelope, for collection and mailing with the United States Postal Service where it would be deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business, addressed as follows: Assistant US Attorney Sherri Walker Hobson United States Attorney's Office 880 Front Street; Suite 6293 San Diego, California 92101 Executed on April 10, 2008, at San Diego, California.

19

20
21

[XX] I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the
State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this
court at whose direction this service was made.
[] (By Facsimile) The facsimile machine I used complied with
Rule 2003 (3) and no error was reported by the machine.
Pursuant to Rule 2008 (e) (4), I caused the machine to
print a record of the transmi~~_il/, ~

22
23
24

25

-~,~J~

26
27
28