Free Discrepancy Order Rejecting Document - District Court of California - California


File Size: 39.2 kB
Pages: 1
Date: May 7, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 334 Words, 2,102 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/267765/8.pdf

Download Discrepancy Order Rejecting Document - District Court of California ( 39.2 kB)


Preview Discrepancy Order Rejecting Document - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cr-01096-LAB

Document 8

Filed 05/07/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: 08cr1096 LAB TITLE: USA v. Rios-Mendoza E-FILED DATE: 5/5/08 DOCKET NO.: 7 DOCUMENT TITLE: Motion for Discovery, Leave to File Further Motions, Granting Access DOCUMENT FILED Defendant BY: Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: x Civil Local Rule or Discrepancy
Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

ECF § 2(h) ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(g) ECF § 2(f) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 X Chambers Standing Order - Criminal Cases Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Civ. L. Rule 15.1 X

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Lacking proper signature Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/document(s) are not timely: Motion should be filed 21 days prior to hearing. Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing table of contents and/or table of authorities Amended pleading not complete in itself OTHER: No Application for Order Shortening Time Showing Good Cause filed.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a X copy of this order on all parties. Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1.

DATED: May 7, 2008

BY: RLS, JA Chambers of Larry Alan Burns United States District Judge