Free Discrepancy Order Rejecting Document - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cr-01109-JLS

Document 9

Filed 04/21/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: 08cr1109 JLS TITLE: USA v. Castaneda-Aceves E-FILED DOCKET NO.: 8 08cr1109 JLS DATE: DOCUMENT TITLE: Government's Sentencing Summary Chart DOCUMENT FILED USA BY: Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: x Civil Local Rule or Discrepancy
Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

ECF § 2(h) Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature x ECF § 2(a), (g) Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed ECF § 2(g) Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments ECF § 2(f) Lacking proper signature Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/document(s) are not timely Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Missing table of contents and/or table of authorities Civ. L. Rule 15.1 Amended pleading not complete in itself x OTHER: Document filed in wrong case IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a X copy of this order on all parties. Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1.

DATED: April 21, 2008 Honorable Janis L. Sammartino United States District Judge