Free Stipulation of Fact and Joint Motion for Release of M/W - District Court of California - California


File Size: 159.5 kB
Pages: 4
Date: July 1, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 983 Words, 6,078 Characters
Page Size: 615.624 x 793.691 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/273756/8.pdf

Download Stipulation of Fact and Joint Motion for Release of M/W - District Court of California ( 159.5 kB)


Preview Stipulation of Fact and Joint Motion for Release of M/W - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cr-02152-BEN

Document 8

Filed 06/26/2008

Page 1 of 4

2 3 4 5 6 7
8

KAREN P. HEWITT United States Attorney JAMES P. MELENDRES Assistant United States Attorney California State Bar No. Pending United States Attorney's Office Federal Office Building 880 Front Street, Room 6293 San Diego, California 9210 1 Telephone: (619) 557-6327 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FILED
JUN 2 0 itJUd "'

-,


9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
) ) )

10 11 12
13

til CR;L()-;). -II> ;,J

Magistrate Case No. 08MJ 1811

)

STIPULATION OF FACT AND JOINT

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

) MOTION FOR RELEASE OF ) MATERIAL WITNESS(ES) AND ORDERTHEREO~N _ HUGO OTERO, ) ) ) Defendant. - - - - - - - - - - - - - )
(Pre-Indictment Fast-Track Program)

v.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the plaintiff, UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA, by and through its counsel, Karen P. Hewitt, United States Attorney, and James P. Melendres, Assistant United States Attorney, and defendant HUGO OTERO, by and through and with the advice and consent of defense counsel, Andrew Lah, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., that:
1.

Defendant agrees to execute this stipulation on or before the 'first preliminary hearing

date and to participate in a full and complete inquiry by the Court into whether defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered into it. Defendant agrees further to waive indictment and plead guilty to the pre-indictment information charging defendant with a non-mandatory minimum count of Bringing in Aliens Without Presentation and Aiding and Abetting, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii) and 18 U.S.C. § 2.

28

II

_ _ _ _ _ _----1L--=-JPME:lg:61l7/08

II

Case 3:08-cr-02152-BEN

Document 8

Filed 06/26/2008

Page 2 of 4

2. 2 3

Defendant acknowledges receipt of a plea agreement in this case and agrees to

provide the signed, original plea agreement to the Government not later than five business days before the disposition date set by the Court.

4
5

3.

Defendant agrees to plead guilty to the charge pursuant to the plea agreement on or

before July 14, 2008.

6

4.

The material witness, Candelaria Sanchez-Lopez, in this case:
a.
b.

7
8

Is an alien with no lawful right to enter or remain in the United States; Entered or attempted to enter the United States illegally on or about

9 10 11 12

June 9, 2008;

c.

Was foundina vehicle driven by defendant at the San Ysidro, California, Port

of Entry (POE), and that defendant knew or acted in reckless disregard of the fact that she was an alien with no lawful right to enter or remain in the United States;
d.

13
14 15 16
17

Was paying or having others pay on her behalf $2,000 to others to be brought

into the United States illegally andlor transported illegally to her destination therein; and, e. May be released and remanded immediately to the Department of Homeland

Security for return to her country of origin.
5.

After the material witness is ordered released by the Court pursuant to this stipulation

18 19 20 21 22

and joint motion, if defendant does not plead guilty to the charge set forth above, for any reason, or thereafter withdraws his guilty plea to that charge, defendant agrees that in any proceeding, including, but not limited to, motion hearings, trial, sentencing, appeal or collateral attack, that: a. substantive evidence;
b.

The stipulated facts set forth in paragraph 4 above shall be admitted as

23
24 25 26
27

The United States may elicit hearsay testimony from arresting agents

regarding any statements made by the material witness(es) provided in discovery, and such testimony shall be admitted as substantive evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 804(b )(3) as statements against interest of (an) unavailable witness(es); and,
II
Stipulation of Fact and Joint Motion for Release of Material Witness(es) And Order Thereon in United States v. Hugo Otero

28

2

08MJl811

Case 3:08-cr-02152-BEN

Document 8

Filed 06/26/2008

Page 3 of 4

1 2 3 4

c.

Understanding that under Crawford v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 1354 (2004),

"testimonial" hearsay statements are not admissible against a defendant unless defendant confronted and cross-examined the witness(es) who made the "testimonial" hearsay statements, defendant waives the right to confront and cross-examine the material witness(es) in this case.

5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18

6.

By signing this stipulation and joint motion, defendant certifies that defendant has

read it (or that it has been read to defendant in defendant's native language). Defendant certifies further that defendant has discussed the terms of this stipulation and joint motion with defense counsel and fully understands its meaning and effect. Based on the foregoing, the parties jointly move the stipulation into evidence and for the immediate release and remand of the above-named material witness(es) to the Department of Homeland Security for return to her country of origin.
It is STIPULATED AND AGREED this date.

Respectfully submitted, KAREN P. HEWITT United States Attorney Dated:

C IL'(

/0 ~ .

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Dated:
Defense~unsel for HUGO OTERO

G- 2 ~ - 06

Defendant

HU~O:fJl c.

26
27

28

Stipulation of Fact and Joint Motion for Release of Material Witness(es) And Order Thereon in United States v. Hugo Otero

3

08MJl811

Case 3:08-cr-02152-BEN

Document 8

Filed 06/26/2008

Page 4 of 4

1

ORDER
Upon joint application and motion of the parties, and for good cause shown,

2 3 4 5
6

THE STIPULATION is admitted into evidence, and, IT IS ORDERED that the above-named material witness(es) be released and remanded
forthwith to the Department of Homeland Security for return to her country of origin.

SO ORDERED.

7
8
9 10

Dated:

-------'-----

United States Magistrate Judge

Ak-~

11
12 13

14
15

16

17
18
19 20 21

22

23

24
25

26
27 28
Stipulation of Fact and Joint Motion for Release of Material Witness(es) And Order Thereon in United States v. Hugo Otero

4

08MJl8ll