Free Motion for Release of Material Witness - District Court of California - California


File Size: 40.9 kB
Pages: 3
Date: September 9, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 644 Words, 4,240 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/274876/22.pdf

Download Motion for Release of Material Witness - District Court of California ( 40.9 kB)


Preview Motion for Release of Material Witness - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cr-02347-BEN

Document 22

Filed 08/19/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

SCHROTH & SCHROTH ROBERT E. SCHROTH, JR, ESQ. (SBN 212936) 2044 First Avenue, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92101 Telephone: (619) 233-7521 Facsimile: (619) 233-4516 Attorney for Material Witnesses, Juan De Rios Garcia-Ramirez, and Jose MendozaHernandez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Hon. WILLIAM MCCURINE JR.) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Criminal Case No.: 08cr2347BEN ) Magistrate Case No.: 08mj2047 ) Plaintiff, ) EX PARTE APPLICATION AND ) [PROPOSED] ORDER RELEASING vs. ) MATERIAL WITNESSES ) RENEE GONZALES-RUBIO, ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________ _______ ) Material Witnesses, Juan De Rios Garcia-Ramirez, and Jose Mendoza-Hernandez, (hereafter "Material Witnesses") by and through their counsel, Robert E. Schroth Jr., hereby submit this Ex Parte Application for an Order Releases the Material Witnesses in the above captioned case pursuant to the Court's Order [Docket #27] dated June 24, 2008, on the grounds that on August 19, 2008 the depositions of the material witness were completed and no party having objected to their release. DATED: August 19, 2008 SCHROTH & SCHROTH By: s/ROBERT E. SCHROTH, JR. ROBERT E. SCHROTH, JR, Attorney for Material Witness

-1 ORDER RELEASING MATERIAL WITNESS

Case 3:08-cr-02347-BEN

Document 22

Filed 08/19/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Hon. WILLIAM MCCURINE JR.)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

) Criminal Case No.: 08cr2347BEN ) Magistrate Case No.: 08mj2047 ) Plaintiff, ) [PROPOSED] ORDER RELEASING ) MATERIAL WITNESSES vs. ) ) RENEE GONZALES-RUBIO, ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) ORDER RELEASING MATERIAL WITNESSES On application of Robert E. Schroth, Jr., attorney for the named material witnesses, Juan De Rios Garcia-Ramirez, and Jose Mendoza-Hernandez; and as their videotaped depositions have been completed pursuant to this Court's Order [Docket #21] dated August 11, 2008, and no party having objected to their release. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, the heretofore material witnesses, Juan De Rios Garcia-Ramirez, and Jose Mendoza-Hernandez having been committed to the custody of the United States Marshal as material witnesses, be released as a material witness. The material witness will be remanded to United States Border Patrol and returned to their country of origin immediately.

Dated: _______________

________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

-2 ORDER RELEASING MATERIAL WITNESS

Case 3:08-cr-02347-BEN

Document 22-2

Filed 08/19/2008

Page 1 of 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Re: USA v. Gonzales-Rubio Criminal Case No.: 08cr2347 Magistrate Case No: 08mj2047 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO I am employed in San Diego, California; I am over the age of eighteen years and am not a party to this action; my business address is 2044 First Avenue, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92101. On August 19, 2008, I served the following document(s) described as: EX PARTE APPLICATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RELEASING MATERIAL WITNESSES on the interested parties in this action by efile service: [email protected]

11 U S Attorney CR [email protected]
Robert E. Schroth Jr., Esq.SCHROTH & SCHROTH 2044 First Avenue, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: (619) 233-7521

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
POS - 1

I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at San Diego, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. __/s/ Robert E. Schroth Jr._ Robert E. Schroth Jr.